Re: [all][SCXML] Whats in the name ...

Thanks for the feedback on this thread. I should also point out that credit is due to anyone who is listed on the component proposal, team list, anyone who voted for or (mildly) against it, the users and so on. It seems atleast some of us support the current name, so my inertia will hold and I'll

Re: [cli] [patch] build bug

On 4/19/06, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 19/04/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Another question - why keep the Avalon logger? (Presuming we were to > > release cli 2.0 and an easier cli 1.1). What's its raison d'etre? > > [It's not a logger ...] Sure, sure. (I was on crac

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39341] - [pool] maxActive, maxIdle, maxTotal apply to all keys in a GenericKeyedObjectPool

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r395466 - in /jakarta/commons/proper/pool/trunk/src: java/org/apache/commons/pool/impl/GenericKeyedObjectPool.java test/org/apache/commons/pool/impl/TestGenericKeyedObjectPool.java

Author: sandymac Date: Wed Apr 19 20:21:57 2006 New Revision: 395466 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=395466&view=rev Log: Fixes bug 39341: javadocs indicated that maxActive, maxIdle, and maxTotal were per key for GenericKeyedObjectPool when they are for the whole pool. Modified: jaka

svn commit: r395465 - /jakarta/commons/proper/pool/trunk/src/test/org/apache/commons/pool/TestObjectPool.java

Author: sandymac Date: Wed Apr 19 20:20:07 2006 New Revision: 395465 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=395465&view=rev Log: small unit test update Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/pool/trunk/src/test/org/apache/commons/pool/TestObjectPool.java Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/pool/tru

Re: [all][SCXML] Whats in the name ...

On 4/19/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > +1 for keeping SCXML. > > Firstly since Rahul has done the work then I don't think we should try > to impose a name. Secondly, since it is an implementation of a spec, > then using that in its names looks like a good idea to me. Lastly if >

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39315] - [lang] New method for EqualsBuilder

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39315] - [lang] New method for EqualsBuilder

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [all][SCXML] Whats in the name ...

+1 for keeping SCXML. Firstly since Rahul has done the work then I don't think we should try to impose a name. Secondly, since it is an implementation of a spec, then using that in its names looks like a good idea to me. Lastly if we want a component with a generic name like "state", "statechart",

Re: [cli] [patch] build bug

On 19/04/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 4/19/06, Andrew Shirley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 09:36:49AM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Hi Henri, > > > > > > > What do you think? Is the cli2 package clearly superior to the cli[1] > > > > package? >

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39340] - [pool] Infinite loop in Evictor of GenericKeyedObjectPool

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [email] commons email: email factory

Steven Paligo wrote: I have created a factory class that creates the SimpleEmail, HtmlEmail, and MultiPartEmail objects which have defaults set from a reloadable .properties file. Can I submit it as a patch or is something like that already being made? I would appreciate a response. External

commons email: email factory

I have created a factory class that creates the SimpleEmail, HtmlEmail, and MultiPartEmail objects which have defaults set from a reloadable .properties file. Can I submit it as a patch or is something like that already being made? I would appreciate a response. Thanks, Steven P. --

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39352] - [daemon] jsvc links to 32-bit JVM when compiled for (64-bit) sparcv9

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [cli] [patch] build bug

Henri Yandell wrote: Seems to be pretty overwhelmingly in favour of cli2 - good to hear that people are using it and are happy. Another option is to split the two packages up and keep cli1 on a branch. Then we can do a cli1.1 release, but for a lot of the bugs we'll just be saying "Sorry, move t

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39257] - [fileupload] FileUploadException on processing multipart/form-data

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: svn commit: r395181 - /jakarta/commons/proper/logging/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/logging/impl/LogFactoryImpl.java

On Wed, 2006-04-19 at 21:09 +1200, Simon Kitching wrote: > Hi Robert, > > As you can see I've had a go at fixing the odd diagnostic message. I'd > be grateful if you could double-check this sometime. > > > The initial code did: > // match package plus first 4 chars > if (candidate.region

svn commit: r395346 - /jakarta/commons/proper/logging/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/logging/impl/LogFactoryImpl.java

Author: rdonkin Date: Wed Apr 19 11:46:30 2006 New Revision: 395346 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=395346&view=rev Log: Need to match at least the first 5 characters. Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/logging/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/logging/impl/LogFactoryImpl.java Modified

svn commit: r395344 - /jakarta/commons/proper/logging/trunk/xdocs/guide.xml

Author: rdonkin Date: Wed Apr 19 11:35:15 2006 New Revision: 395344 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=395344&view=rev Log: Added a little explaination concerning the recommendation. Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/logging/trunk/xdocs/guide.xml Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/logging/t

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39341] - [pool] maxActive, maxIdle, maxTotal apply to all keys in a GenericKeyedObjectPool

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [cli] [patch] build bug

On 4/19/06, Andrew Shirley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 09:36:49AM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi Henri, > > > > > What do you think? Is the cli2 package clearly superior to the cli[1] > > > package? > > I think so. There doesn't seem to be any advantage to cli[1], c

RE: [logging] diagnostics, RC failure in webapp

On Wed, 2006-04-19 at 10:50 +0200, Jörg Schaible wrote: > Simon Kitching wrote on Wednesday, April 19, 2006 10:26 AM: > > > On Wed, 2006-04-19 at 08:17 +0200, Jörg Schaible wrote: > [snip] > >> > >> Well, I have the funny situation the other way round! Due > > to some plugins in Eclipse's DTP sub

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39340] - [pool] Infinite loop in Evictor of GenericKeyedObjectPool

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39340] - [pool] Infinite loop in Evictor of GenericKeyedObjectPool

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39257] - [fileupload] FileUploadException on processing multipart/form-data

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39352] - jsvc links to 32-bit JVM when compiled for (64-bit) sparcv9

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39352] - jsvc links to 32-bit JVM when compiled for (64-bit) sparcv9

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39352] New: - jsvc links to 32-bit JVM when compiled for (64-bit) sparcv9

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-html (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-html has an issue affecting its community integration. This i

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-html (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-html has an issue affecting its community integration. This i

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-javaflow (in module jakarta-commons-sandbox) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-javaflow has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue aff

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-javaflow (in module jakarta-commons-sandbox) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-javaflow has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue aff

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test has an issue affecting its community integration.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test has an issue affecting its community integration.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test has an issue affecting its community integration. Th

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test has an issue affecting its community integration. Th

svn commit: r395202 - in /jakarta/commons/proper/logging/trunk: RELEASE-NOTES.txt xdocs/guide.xml xdocs/troubleshooting.xml

Author: skitching Date: Wed Apr 19 03:39:49 2006 New Revision: 395202 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=395202&view=rev Log: Add information about some containers effectively forcing parentFirst=true for JCL classes. Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/logging/trunk/RELEASE-NOTES.txt j

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-quartz (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-quartz has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-quartz (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-quartz has an issue affecting its community integration. This

svn commit: r395196 - /jakarta/commons/proper/logging/trunk/xdocs/building.xml

Author: skitching Date: Wed Apr 19 03:14:01 2006 New Revision: 395196 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=395196&view=rev Log: Note that building requires maven 1.x Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/logging/trunk/xdocs/building.xml Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/logging/trunk/xdocs/build

svn commit: r395185 - /jakarta/commons/proper/logging/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/logging/package.html

Author: skitching Date: Wed Apr 19 02:33:50 2006 New Revision: 395185 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=395185&view=rev Log: The use of static Log objects may or may not be safe depending on how that code is intended to be deployed. It's therefore better for the examples to show the safest

Re: [cli] [patch] build bug

On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 09:36:49AM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi Henri, > > > What do you think? Is the cli2 package clearly superior to the cli[1] > > package? I think so. There doesn't seem to be any advantage to cli[1], cli2 is better designed and the avalon code appears to be simpler

Re: svn commit: r395181 - /jakarta/commons/proper/logging/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/logging/impl/LogFactoryImpl.java

Hi Robert, As you can see I've had a go at fixing the odd diagnostic message. I'd be grateful if you could double-check this sometime. The initial code did: // match package plus first 4 chars if (candidate.regionMatches(true, 0, name, 0, 38)) {...} I presume the "38" was meant to be l

svn commit: r395181 - /jakarta/commons/proper/logging/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/logging/impl/LogFactoryImpl.java

Author: skitching Date: Wed Apr 19 01:57:54 2006 New Revision: 395181 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=395181&view=rev Log: Fix problem with "suggested" alternative for invalid log adapter class. Always trim whitespace from user-specified log adapter class name. Modified: jakarta/commo

RE: [logging] diagnostics, RC failure in webapp

Simon Kitching wrote on Wednesday, April 19, 2006 10:26 AM: > On Wed, 2006-04-19 at 08:17 +0200, Jörg Schaible wrote: [snip] >> >> Well, I have the funny situation the other way round! Due > to some plugins in Eclipse's DTP subproject, Eclipse can no > longer launch the internal help, that is bas

RE: [logging] diagnostics, RC failure in webapp

On Wed, 2006-04-19 at 08:17 +0200, Jörg Schaible wrote: > robert burrell donkin wrote on Tuesday, April 18, 2006 11:14 PM: > > > On Mon, 2006-04-17 at 20:48 +1200, Simon Kitching wrote: > > > > > > > >> Conclusions: > >> > >> There isn't really anything wrong with the current RC8 code, except