DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38873.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-id has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue affects
This thread is somewhat old but I have a new information...
I have just been pointed to the following FAQ by a friend:
http://www.dallaway.com/acad/webstart/
Several good things in there... but one that is particularly worth it is
about the usage of *different certificates* for different jars.
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONFIGURATION-215?page=comments#action_12416477
]
Michiel Kalkman commented on CONFIGURATION-215:
---
Knowing in which location a certain configuration item was specificied, would
help in implementing a
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test has an issue affecting its community
integration.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test has an issue affecting its community
integration.
anyone? please :-)
/Christian Andersson
Christian Andersson wrote:
Hi there, I have a small problem that I'. hoping that you can help me solve.
I want to be able to run tomcat on a server that we have available at a
hosting firm.
I can get tomcat up and running on it witohut problem,
Hello
I wrote several methods that I'd like to donate to IOCommons FileUtil class
/** converts file (or directory) to byte array using jar algorithm */
byte[] toJarBytesArray(File file) throws IOException
/** converts file (or directory) to byte array using zip algorithm */
byte[]
On 6/16/06, Vitaliy S [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
I wrote several methods that I'd like to donate to IOCommons FileUtil class
/** converts file (or directory) to byte array using jar algorithm */
byte[] toJarBytesArray(File file) throws IOException
/** converts file (or directory) to byte
Thanks,
I will send patch next week.
Regard,
Vitaliy S
On 6/16/06, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/16/06, Vitaliy S [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
I wrote several methods that I'd like to donate to IOCommons FileUtil class
/** converts file (or directory) to byte array
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COLLECTIONS-213?page=comments#action_12416539
]
Dusan Chromy commented on COLLECTIONS-213:
--
It just occured to me - in the middle of CollectionUtils-style programming :-)
- that the addition of the Iterator
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28358.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28358.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Oliver Heger wrote:
Hi,
on the user list there were some postings asking for another release.
Does anybody object if I begin with some preparations? This will take
some time though because I will probably be quite busy the next time.
If you want to have some special features included in
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38873.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Oliver Heger wrote:
Hi,
on the user list there were some postings asking for another release.
Does anybody object if I begin with some preparations? This will take
some time though because I will probably be quite busy the next time.
If you want to have some special
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-226?page=comments#action_12416586 ]
Gary Gregory commented on LANG-226:
---
Do you have any time to look at unifying those Gary?
I've just come back from my honeymoon and I will not be able to take the time
to
Any thoughts on having a 2.3 release that focuses on the 5 enum
issues?
I'm +1. Release early, release often, a la XP.
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 12:45 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: [lang]
Author: polx
Date: Fri Jun 16 16:22:25 2006
New Revision: 414955
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=414955view=rev
Log:
Style cleanup.
paul
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/jelly/trunk/jelly-tags/interaction/src/java/org/apache/commons/jelly/tags/interaction/AskTag.java
Modified:
Author: polx
Date: Fri Jun 16 16:22:47 2006
New Revision: 414956
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=414956view=rev
Log:
Little polish to the site...
paul
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/jelly/trunk/jelly-tags/interaction/xdocs/changes.xml
robert burrell donkin wrote:
On Tue, 2006-05-09 at 23:07 +0200, Paul Libbrecht wrote:
The story seems quite simple so I thought I'd just ask for a vote sorry if too
stressed.
The interaction jelly tag-library is now ready for release 1.1.
It has been recently boosted with a finer control
On 6/17/06, Paul Libbrecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
On Tue, 2006-05-09 at 23:07 +0200, Paul Libbrecht wrote:
The story seems quite simple so I thought I'd just ask for a vote sorry if
too stressed.
The interaction jelly tag-library is now ready for release 1.1.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DBCP-175?page=all ]
Jerome Lacoste updated DBCP-175:
Attachment: DBCP-175-1.txt
DBCP-175-2.txt
DBCP-175-1.txt is a version of the change that is similar to the original
request. It allows one to
Hi,
Adding a way to run initialization statements after connection
creation allowed us to cleanly solve some Oracle sorting issues. This
issue was in fact independently reported last year (DBCP-175).
I've attached 2 patches to Jira and would appreciate feedback, in
particular regarding the
Hello,
I apologize if this is a stupid question. I know there is an archive but I
didn't find a way to search it. I have tried to request for info and FAQ but
none available.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks in advance!
Regards,
Kenneth
On 6/17/06, Kenneth Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I apologize if this is a stupid question. I know there is an archive but I
didn't find a way to search it. I have tried to request for info and FAQ but
none available.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks in advance!
On 6/16/06, Jochen Wiedmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As I understand it, by the time you call getInputStream(), the user's POST
request is already entirely in the server's memory space, or it has been
written to disk. This data isn't consumed when you read() it, so
27 matches
Mail list logo
