Author: bayard
Date: Mon Sep 11 23:34:44 2006
New Revision: 442481
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=442481
Log:
Refactored the option code to make it easier to add options; and added a few
more options
Modified:
OK, seeing as we have reached some kind of consensus on how to handle
backards-incompatible JDK releases, I'm restarting the vote for a
release of Commons::Net 2.0 (the JDK 5.0 branch).
As per usual, just respond with
+1
+0
-0
-1
Thanks
Rory
Invokes Date Validator for a Date type (fail on real example)
-
Key: CLI-125
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLI-125
Project: Commons CLI
Issue Type: Bug
Affects
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLI-125?page=all ]
David Leal updated CLI-125:
---
Attachment: com.zip
All required source files. In order to compile you will need the Commons Lang
Library (for enums), but this is required too for CLI.
Invokes Date
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLI-125?page=all ]
David Leal updated CLI-125:
---
Attachment: TestBatchCallerCommandLineParser.java
The testing class, the test fails when testing the method: testRealExamples.
Invokes Date Validator for a Date type
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLI-125?page=all ]
David Leal updated CLI-125:
---
Attachment:
TEST-com.schinvest.lra.business.batch.commandLine.batchCaller.TestBatchCallerCommandLineParser.txt
Output of the test.
Invokes Date Validator for a Date type
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLI-125?page=comments#action_12434108 ]
David Leal commented on CLI-125:
I have tested the example, under Java:
C:\Documents and Settings\X017735java -version
java version 1.5.0_06
Java(TM) 2 Runtime
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test has an issue affecting its community
integration.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test has an issue affecting its community
integration.
javadoc for StringUtils.removeEnd is incorrect
--
Key: LANG-278
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-278
Project: Commons Lang
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 2.1
Failed build logs:
http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/commons-nightlies/20060912/finder.log
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rory Winston wrote:
OK, seeing as we have reached some kind of consensus on how to handle
backards-incompatible JDK releases, I'm restarting the vote for a
release of Commons::Net 2.0 (the JDK 5.0 branch).
As per usual, just respond with
+1
+0
-0
-1
Thanks
Rory
Steve
Sorry, I should have been more specific
1) Yes, there will be two separate branches of development. At the
moment, the trunk is the 1.x branch, whereas there is a separate branch
for JDK 5.0 dev. We can keep this the way it is, or swap the trunk and
branch at some stage.
2) We need
Author: nuttycom
Date: Tue Sep 12 07:38:18 2006
New Revision: 442595
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=442595
Log:
Added IllegalStateException for missing branch pipeline and accessor method for
parent. Patch provided by Steve Christensen.
Modified:
Author: nuttycom
Date: Tue Sep 12 07:43:10 2006
New Revision: 442597
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=442597
Log:
Added contributors section for individuals who have contributed patches.
Modified:
jakarta/commons/sandbox/pipeline/trunk/pom.xml
Modified:
Author: bayard
Date: Tue Sep 12 08:29:31 2006
New Revision: 442618
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=442618
Log:
Fixing javadoc example and adding a unit test to prove the example; as reported
in #LANG-278
Modified:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-278?page=all ]
Henri Yandell resolved LANG-278.
Fix Version/s: 2.2
Resolution: Fixed
svn ci -m Fixing javadoc example and adding a unit test to prove the example;
as
reported in #LANG-278
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38633.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi all,
Is there currently any activity/planning/effort going on in Commons
Configuration. I'm interested in an adaptation of the framework which
could be contributed back into the project if found acceptable.
Specifically in the following areas:
1.) wildcards, regexp is File Selections
On Sep 11, 2006, at 4:18 PM, Oliver Heger wrote:
Mark Diggory wrote:
Hello Friends,
I notice that the code for AbstractConfiguration eats exceptions
that the javadoc claims it should throw.
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/configuration/xref/org/apache/
Commons Validator 1.3.0 source distribution's build.xml neglects to include
validator_1_1_3.dtd in JAR
--
Key: VALIDATOR-199
URL:
Hello Mark,
Commons Configuration is still active though it looks like that
currently I am the only committer (have not heard anything from the
others for some time now). ATM I am trying to get a new release (1.3) out.
Your extensions sound very interesting. Especially the point about JNDI
Author: oheger
Date: Tue Sep 12 13:03:18 2006
New Revision: 442690
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=442690
Log:
JavaDoc enhancement related to CONFIGURATION-226
Modified:
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONFIGURATION-226?page=comments#action_12434254
]
Oliver Heger commented on CONFIGURATION-226:
The JavaDoc of the getBoolean() methods was updated to point to
PropertyConfiguration.toBoolean()
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Rory Winston writes:
OK, seeing as we have reached some kind of consensus on how to handle
backards-incompatible JDK releases, I'm restarting the vote for a
release of Commons::Net 2.0 (the JDK 5.0 branch).
+0
I was hoping to see more radical API and
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLI-125?page=comments#action_12434286 ]
Andrew Shirley commented on CLI-125:
I have looked at this tonight and not really got anywhere. The problem is
essentially that the validator is being called
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEANUTILS-200?page=all ]
Henri Yandell updated BEANUTILS-200:
Bugzilla Id: (was: 34523)
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.8.0)
[beanutils] Need a BeanUtils.describeRaw method
My question is whether 2.0 is backwards compatible with 1.0. If it
isn't, then how are we going to handle the situation where two different
OSS projects refer to two different versions of [net] - jar-hell.
Stephen
Rory Winston wrote:
Steve
Sorry, I should have been more specific
1) Yes,
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLI-125?page=comments#action_12434301 ]
David Leal commented on CLI-125:
Andrew,
That is right, the validator is called twice without sense. After invokation of
validate, the list is converted into Date
I don't know whether a WeakHashMap works when the keys are Class objects
(as Class objects aren't exactly run-of the-mill).
This fix might work, or it might break things somewhere else. The
[logging] team may be able to comment on WeakHashMap.
ATM, I'm against fixing it in a rush.
Stephen
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLI-113?page=comments#action_12434307 ]
David Leal commented on CLI-113:
The similar product JSAP, provide such utility, it simplify a lot the process
of defining the input argument syntax, because you
Author: bayard
Date: Tue Sep 12 16:16:30 2006
New Revision: 442755
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=442755
Log:
Switching the catch(Exception - throw ClassCast to code that catches the
particular exceptions thrown and rethrows them as RuntimeExceptions. The
previous catch caught
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEANUTILS-241?page=all ]
Henri Yandell closed BEANUTILS-241.
---
Fix Version/s: 1.8.0
Resolution: Fixed
svn ci -m Switching the catch(Exception - throw ClassCast to code that
catches the particular
Subcomponents of Commons components are a bad thing I think. Does any
body mind if I move the beanutils optional beanutils-collection up to
commons/proper ?
Anyone know where the collections test framework that it depends on lives? :)
Attributes, Jelly and JCI are the others ones I know of with
On 13/09/2006, at 9:22 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
Subcomponents of Commons components are a bad thing I think.
Is there any reason for this? What will moving them improve?
- Brett
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEANUTILS-10?page=comments#action_12434331
]
Henri Yandell commented on BEANUTILS-10:
Seems that the solution is in a more expressive registration system. Be able to
set a converter for a bean
Hi Folks,
We (Roger Kapsi I) would like to contribute a fully featured Patricia
Trie. The class is currently designed for Java 1.5 generics, although that
can easily be removed if required. It is designed to allow any kind of
key/value pair, ranging from Strings to IP addresses to anything
multi-threaded implemenation of StageDriver
---
Key: SANDBOX-171
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SANDBOX-171
Project: Commons Sandbox
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: Pipeline
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SANDBOX-171?page=all ]
Steve Christensen updated SANDBOX-171:
--
Attachment: ThreadPoolStageDriver.zip
multi-threaded implemenation of StageDriver
---
On 9/12/06, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 13/09/2006, at 9:22 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
Subcomponents of Commons components are a bad thing I think.
Is there any reason for this? What will moving them improve?
It makes us treat them as real components and not as hidden away
On 13/09/2006, at 2:48 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
On 9/12/06, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 13/09/2006, at 9:22 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
Subcomponents of Commons components are a bad thing I think.
Is there any reason for this? What will moving them improve?
It makes us treat
41 matches
Mail list logo
