[jira] Created: (COLLECTIONS-231) Not return the base interface on decorate

2006-10-30 Thread Torsten Curdt (JIRA)
Not return the base interface on decorate - Key: COLLECTIONS-231 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COLLECTIONS-231 Project: Commons Collections Issue Type: Improvement Components:

Re: [PROPOSAL] Major versions require package name change

2006-10-30 Thread James Carman
I agree. I don't think we should mandate this either. On 10/29/06, Rory Winston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That should be an appropriate solution *for everybody* Rory Winston wrote: +1 I agree this is an issue which package maintainers will need to consider when making major releases. I

[jira] Created: (COLLECTIONS-232) Some tests contain assertEquals arguments in the incorrect order

2006-10-30 Thread Mark Hindess (JIRA)
Some tests contain assertEquals arguments in the incorrect order Key: COLLECTIONS-232 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COLLECTIONS-232 Project: Commons Collections

[jira] Updated: (COLLECTIONS-232) Some tests contain assertEquals arguments in the incorrect order

2006-10-30 Thread Mark Hindess (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COLLECTIONS-232?page=all ] Mark Hindess updated COLLECTIONS-232: - Attachment: fix.assertEquals.usage.diff Some tests contain assertEquals arguments in the incorrect order

Re: [PROPOSAL] Major versions require package name change

2006-10-30 Thread Torsten Curdt
There are clearly good reasons / circumstances to take the approach you suggest, but it is a user unfriendly approach. As a user I like to try out new versions by dropping in a new jar - before taking the decision to upgrade. This approach rules that out and it wouldn't surprise me if users

Re: [PROPOSAL] Major versions require package name change

2006-10-30 Thread James Carman
I think the point is that we don't think this should be mandated and up to the individual project teams to decide what they want to do. I would agree that this option should be standardized (appending the major release version number to the package name) so that folks know what's going on if it

[jira] Created: (POOL-88) Better maintenance of GKOP per-pool activeCount

2006-10-30 Thread JIRA
Better maintenance of GKOP per-pool activeCount --- Key: POOL-88 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/POOL-88 Project: Commons Pool Issue Type: Improvement Affects Versions: Nightly

[jira] Updated: (POOL-88) Better maintenance of GKOP per-pool activeCount

2006-10-30 Thread JIRA
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/POOL-88?page=all ] Holger Hoffstätte updated POOL-88: -- Attachment: activeCount.patch Patch for per-key/pool ObjectQueue metadata structure against svn trunk r469023. All related tests still pass. Better

[sandbox-openpgp] web site update

2006-10-30 Thread Antoine Levy-Lambert
Hi, I have just updated the web site of openpgp in the sandbox. Thanks Brett for telling me about mvn site-deploy. The documentation of the ant task which I have created called signer is available. Regards, Antoine - To

Re: [PROPOSAL] Major versions require package name change

2006-10-30 Thread Niall Pemberton
On 10/30/06, Torsten Curdt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There are clearly good reasons / circumstances to take the approach you suggest, but it is a user unfriendly approach. As a user I like to try out new versions by dropping in a new jar - before taking the decision to upgrade. This approach

[jira] Commented: (POOL-88) Better maintenance of GKOP per-pool activeCount

2006-10-30 Thread JIRA
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/POOL-88?page=comments#action_12445595 ] Holger Hoffstätte commented on POOL-88: --- Some more notes: - class ObjectQueue is not static so that inc/decActiveCount can modify the global activeCount too.

[jira] Created: (POOL-89) Inconsistency with TestGenericKeyedObjectPool.testMaxTotalLRU

2006-10-30 Thread JIRA
Inconsistency with TestGenericKeyedObjectPool.testMaxTotalLRU - Key: POOL-89 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/POOL-89 Project: Commons Pool Issue Type: Bug Affects

[jira] Commented: (POOL-89) Inconsistency with TestGenericKeyedObjectPool.testMaxTotalLRU

2006-10-30 Thread JIRA
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/POOL-89?page=comments#action_12445600 ] Holger Hoffstätte commented on POOL-89: --- I suspect that the evictor thread is simply not up and running quickly enough; new threads sometimes take quite a

Re: [PROPOSAL] Major versions require package name change

2006-10-30 Thread Torsten Curdt
On 10/30/06, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 10/30/06, Torsten Curdt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There are clearly good reasons / circumstances to take the approach you suggest, but it is a user unfriendly approach. As a user I like to try out new versions by dropping in a new jar

Re: [PROPOSAL] Major versions require package name change

2006-10-30 Thread Rory Winston
Torsten I dont get the analogy either - I didnt see how it helped prove your point. I understand your arguments though, and I can see your point, but I still can't see any convincing arguments for mandating this type of approach. Best left to the individual project maintainers, IMHO. Jakarta

Re: [PROPOSAL] Major versions require package name change

2006-10-30 Thread Rory Winston
Torsten I dont get the analogy either - I didnt see how it helped prove your point. I understand your arguments though, and I can see your point, but I still can't see any convincing arguments for mandating this type of approach. Best left to the individual project maintainers, IMHO. Jakarta

Re: TLS for FTP

2006-10-30 Thread Susanne Lefvert
On Oct 29, 2006, at 4:17 PM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote: Niklas Gustavsson wrote: Rory Winston wrote: Susanne It may be possible that there is a bug in the FTPSClient impl - can you post a transcript of the FTP commands and responses sent over the wire? I've now tested this with FtpServer

Re: TLS for FTP

2006-10-30 Thread Niklas Gustavsson
Susanne Lefvert wrote: Ok, I'll give this a try. Just fyi, I'm running the client in passive mode but I still get this error. These are the commands I'm using: FTPSClient ftps = new FTPSClient(true); ftps.addProtocolCommandListener(new PrintCommandListener(log)); ftps.connect(host, port);

Re: TLS for FTP

2006-10-30 Thread Susanne Lefvert
On Oct 30, 2006, at 10:48 AM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote: Susanne Lefvert wrote: Ok, I'll give this a try. Just fyi, I'm running the client in passive mode but I still get this error. These are the commands I'm using: FTPSClient ftps = new FTPSClient(true);

Re: TLS for FTP

2006-10-30 Thread Susanne Lefvert
Ok, if I remove ftps.enterLocalPassiveMode(), it works. Not sure why?? On Oct 30, 2006, at 11:33 AM, Susanne Lefvert wrote: On Oct 30, 2006, at 10:48 AM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote: Susanne Lefvert wrote: Ok, I'll give this a try. Just fyi, I'm running the client in passive mode but I

Re: [PROPOSAL] Major versions require package name change

2006-10-30 Thread Sandy McArthur
On 10/29/06, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: PROPOSAL: The major version number of a component, where it is greater than 1, shall be included in the package name. I gotta disagree with this. If we want to come up with the notion of a super version, something that is more broad

Re: [PROPOSAL] Major versions require package name change

2006-10-30 Thread Stephen Colebourne
From: Sandy McArthur [EMAIL PROTECTED] If we want to come up with the notion of a super version, something that is more broad than a major version and includes non-backwards compatible changes I'm fine with that. But mandating that any major release be completely non-backwards compatible is

[jira] Commented: (POOL-86) GenericKeyedObjectPool retaining too many idle objects

2006-10-30 Thread Mike Martin (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/POOL-86?page=comments#action_12445665 ] Mike Martin commented on POOL-86: - Sandy wrote: I think you have minimize and maximize backwards and reusing idle objects is why you'd want to use a pool. There are

Re: [PROPOSAL] Major versions require package name change

2006-10-30 Thread Martin Cooper
On 10/30/06, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Sandy McArthur [EMAIL PROTECTED] If we want to come up with the notion of a super version, something that is more broad than a major version and includes non-backwards compatible changes I'm fine with that. But mandating that

RE: [PROPOSAL] Major versions require package name change

2006-10-30 Thread Gary Gregory
In my mind, name vs. name2 makes sense seems for a next generation based on new code rather than a next version. Thank you, Gary -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sandy McArthur Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 9:41 AM To: Jakarta

Re: [PROPOSAL] Major versions require package name change

2006-10-30 Thread Sandy McArthur
On 10/30/06, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Sandy McArthur [EMAIL PROTECTED] If we want to come up with the notion of a super version, something that is more broad than a major version and includes non-backwards compatible changes I'm fine with that. But mandating that

Re: [sandbox-openpgp] web site update

2006-10-30 Thread Brett Porter
Thanks! On 30/10/2006, at 11:49 PM, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: Hi, I have just updated the web site of openpgp in the sandbox. Thanks Brett for telling me about mvn site-deploy. The documentation of the ant task which I have created called signer is available. Regards, Antoine

[jira] Updated: (POOL-86) GenericKeyedObjectPool retaining too many idle objects

2006-10-30 Thread Mike Martin (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/POOL-86?page=all ] Mike Martin updated POOL-86: Attachment: pool-86.patch Here's a copy of the patch as applied against the current trunk sources. GenericKeyedObjectPool retaining too many idle objects

[jira] Resolved: (CONFIGURATION-227) ConfigurationDynaBean does not work well with all types of configurations

2006-10-30 Thread Oliver Heger (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONFIGURATION-227?page=all ] Oliver Heger resolved CONFIGURATION-227. Fix Version/s: Nightly Builds Resolution: Fixed A fix was applied that improves the compatibility of ConfigurationDynaBean with

svn commit: r469224 - in /jakarta/commons/proper/betwixt/trunk/xdocs/guide: binding.xml derived.xml examples.xml reading.xml start.xml tutorial.xml writing.xml

2006-10-30 Thread rdonkin
Author: rdonkin Date: Mon Oct 30 10:32:32 2006 New Revision: 469224 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=469224 Log: Fixing speiling mistakes. Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/betwixt/trunk/xdocs/guide/binding.xml jakarta/commons/proper/betwixt/trunk/xdocs/guide/derived.xml

svn commit: r469223 - /jakarta/commons/proper/betwixt/trunk/build.xml

2006-10-30 Thread rdonkin
Author: rdonkin Date: Mon Oct 30 10:31:40 2006 New Revision: 469223 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=469223 Log: Regenerate using latest maven settings. Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/betwixt/trunk/build.xml Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/betwixt/trunk/build.xml URL:

svn commit: r469259 - in /jakarta/commons/proper/configuration/trunk: src/java/org/apache/commons/configuration/beanutils/ src/test/org/apache/commons/configuration/beanutils/ xdocs/

2006-10-30 Thread oheger
Author: oheger Date: Mon Oct 30 12:22:50 2006 New Revision: 469259 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=469259 Log: Updated ConfigurationDynaBean to better work together with different types of configurations; fix for CONFIGURATION-227 Added:

Re: the best way to get involved?

2006-10-30 Thread Henri Yandell
On 10/29/06, Alex English [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Everybody! I am new to the commons as a developer, but I have been using the libraries for a while now, and I would like to give something back. My question is this - what areas are most in need of maintenance or improvement? I have gone

svn commit: r469268 - in /jakarta/commons/proper/configuration/trunk: src/java/org/apache/commons/configuration/SubsetConfiguration.java src/test/org/apache/commons/configuration/TestBaseConfiguration

2006-10-30 Thread oheger
Author: oheger Date: Mon Oct 30 12:50:59 2006 New Revision: 469268 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=469268 Log: Updated SubsetConfiguration to support interpolation for non string values, too; fix for CONFIGURATION-235 Modified:

[jira] Resolved: (CONFIGURATION-235) variable interpolation problem

2006-10-30 Thread Oliver Heger (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONFIGURATION-235?page=all ] Oliver Heger resolved CONFIGURATION-235. Fix Version/s: Nightly Builds Resolution: Fixed Should be fixed in the next nightly builds. Thank you for spotting this.

[jira] Updated: (POOL-86) GenericKeyedObjectPool retaining too many idle objects

2006-10-30 Thread Mike Martin (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/POOL-86?page=all ] Mike Martin updated POOL-86: Attachment: pool-86.withtest.patch I've attached another patch which includes the necessary changes to the unit test. GenericKeyedObjectPool retaining too many idle

Re: [PROPOSAL] Major versions require package name change

2006-10-30 Thread Henri Yandell
On 10/30/06, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Sandy McArthur [EMAIL PROTECTED] If we want to come up with the notion of a super version, something that is more broad than a major version and includes non-backwards compatible changes I'm fine with that. But mandating that

[jira] Commented: (FILEUPLOAD-118) Maven pom has invalid parent

2006-10-30 Thread Henri Yandell (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FILEUPLOAD-118?page=comments#action_12445718 ] Henri Yandell commented on FILEUPLOAD-118: -- *ping*. The notification for fileupload was turned off, so I've turned it back on and am making sure

Re: [PROPOSAL] Major versions require package name change

2006-10-30 Thread Martin Cooper
On 10/30/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 10/30/06, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Sandy McArthur [EMAIL PROTECTED] If we want to come up with the notion of a super version, something that is more broad than a major version and includes non-backwards

[Jakarta-commons Wiki] Update of Betwixt by RobertBurrellDonkin

2006-10-30 Thread Apache Wiki
Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Jakarta-commons Wiki for change notification. The following page has been changed by RobertBurrellDonkin: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/Betwixt

[Jakarta-commons Wiki] Update of Betwixt/0.8ReleasePlan by RobertBurrellDonkin

2006-10-30 Thread Apache Wiki
Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Jakarta-commons Wiki for change notification. The following page has been changed by RobertBurrellDonkin: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/Betwixt/0%2e8ReleasePlan The comment on the change is: Betwixt 0.8 Release

[Jakarta-commons Wiki] Update of Betwixt/0.8ReleasePlan by RobertBurrellDonkin

2006-10-30 Thread Apache Wiki
Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Jakarta-commons Wiki for change notification. The following page has been changed by RobertBurrellDonkin: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/Betwixt/0%2e8ReleasePlan The comment on the change is: Next time, look before

[Jakarta-commons Wiki] Update of Betwixt/0.8ReleasePlan by RobertBurrellDonkin

2006-10-30 Thread Apache Wiki
Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Jakarta-commons Wiki for change notification. The following page has been changed by RobertBurrellDonkin: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/Betwixt/0%2e8ReleasePlan The comment on the change is: Added notes about

[betwixt] Propose 0.8 Release

2006-10-30 Thread robert burrell donkin
i've taken a good look at the code base, tidied up some legal issues and some bad speiling. looks good. so, i've created a minimal release plan here: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/Betwixt/0.8ReleasePlan. unless there are any other volunteers, i'll act as release managers. sound ok? -

Re: [PROPOSAL] Major versions require package name change

2006-10-30 Thread Henri Yandell
On 10/30/06, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 10/30/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 10/30/06, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Sandy McArthur [EMAIL PROTECTED] If we want to come up with the notion of a super version, something that is more broad

Re: [PROPOSAL] Major versions require package name change

2006-10-30 Thread Sandy McArthur
On 10/30/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 10/30/06, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Sandy McArthur [EMAIL PROTECTED] If we want to come up with the notion of a super version, something that is more broad than a major version and includes non-backwards

Re: [betwixt] Propose 0.8 Release

2006-10-30 Thread Henri Yandell
On 10/30/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i've taken a good look at the code base, tidied up some legal issues and some bad speiling. looks good. so, i've created a minimal release plan here: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/Betwixt/0.8ReleasePlan. unless there are any

Re: [PROPOSAL] Major versions require package name change

2006-10-30 Thread Henri Yandell
On 10/30/06, Sandy McArthur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 10/30/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 10/30/06, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Sandy McArthur [EMAIL PROTECTED] If we want to come up with the notion of a super version, something that is more broad

Re: [PROPOSAL] Major versions require package name change

2006-10-30 Thread Luc Maisonobe
someone said: So what does a major version mean? Surely a major version means we have changed the code so it is no longer compatible, you cannot upgrade simlpy and easily This may or may not be true and it also depend on how the product is used. Some power users may consider an apparent

Re: [PROPOSAL] Major versions require package name change

2006-10-30 Thread Henri Yandell
On 10/30/06, Luc Maisonobe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (I'm not sure I allowed to express this opinion as I am only a new contributor, please ignore this message if you consider this a reserved topic). Please, comment away. All topics are open, and this one especially so given that it's talking

[jira] Commented: (FILEUPLOAD-117) Check file upload size only if an upload limit has been imposed

2006-10-30 Thread Henri Yandell (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FILEUPLOAD-117?page=comments#action_12445737 ] Henri Yandell commented on FILEUPLOAD-117: -- Though I'd ping this on the list - anyone have any thoughts on this? Seems pretty simple. (repeating

[jira] Resolved: (BEANUTILS-246) BeanUtils.getSimpleProperty(obj, field); bug

2006-10-30 Thread Henri Yandell (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEANUTILS-246?page=all ] Henri Yandell resolved BEANUTILS-246. - Resolution: Won't Fix Supporting vLan - getVLan would break compliance with the bean spec. Marking this as wontfix.

[jira] Commented: (DBCP-199) The last used time in AbandonedTrace should be updated more frequently.

2006-10-30 Thread Henri Yandell (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DBCP-199?page=comments#action_12445738 ] Henri Yandell commented on DBCP-199: Is this planned for the next DBCP release? 1.2.2? 1.3? The last used time in AbandonedTrace should be updated more

[jira] Updated: (FILEUPLOAD-117) Check file upload size only if an upload limit has been imposed

2006-10-30 Thread Henri Yandell (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FILEUPLOAD-117?page=all ] Henri Yandell updated FILEUPLOAD-117: - Comment: was deleted Check file upload size only if an upload limit has been imposed

[jira] Commented: (DIGESTER-109) FromXmlRuleSet and SetNextRule classloader issue

2006-10-30 Thread Henri Yandell (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIGESTER-109?page=comments#action_12445745 ] Henri Yandell commented on DIGESTER-109: The -Xbootclasspath is definitely a likely suspect in causing the null pointers - still not as if we're saying

[jira] Commented: (FILEUPLOAD-117) Check file upload size only if an upload limit has been imposed

2006-10-30 Thread Martin Cooper (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FILEUPLOAD-117?page=comments#action_12445746 ] Martin Cooper commented on FILEUPLOAD-117: -- This is probably no longer relevant, since Jochen's streaming changes also eliminate the up-front

Re: [PROPOSAL] Major versions require package name change

2006-10-30 Thread Niall Pemberton
On 10/30/06, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Sandy McArthur [EMAIL PROTECTED] If we want to come up with the notion of a super version, something that is more broad than a major version and includes non-backwards compatible changes I'm fine with that. But mandating that

[jira] Commented: (LANG-291) Null-safe comparison methods for finding most recent / least recent dates.

2006-10-30 Thread Henri Yandell (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-291?page=comments#action_12445736 ] Henri Yandell commented on LANG-291: It seems to me that these are more specific cases of Comparable.compareTo. Rather than the above we could have:

Re: [PROPOSAL] Major versions require package name change

2006-10-30 Thread Niall Pemberton
On 10/30/06, Luc Maisonobe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (I'm not sure I allowed to express this opinion as I am only a new contributor, please ignore this message if you consider this a reserved topic). Absolutely you're allowed - its a public mailing list - there aren't any reserved topics here

[jira] Created: (BEANUTILS-253) Converters per property rather than per type

2006-10-30 Thread Henri Yandell (JIRA)
Converters per property rather than per type Key: BEANUTILS-253 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEANUTILS-253 Project: Commons BeanUtils Issue Type: New Feature Reporter:

[jira] Commented: (CODEC-51) 2 Test failures in SoundexTest

2006-10-30 Thread Henri Yandell (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CODEC-51?page=comments#action_12445749 ] Henri Yandell commented on CODEC-51: I'll try it out on a few other platforms. OS X and FreeBSD at least. 2 Test failures in SoundexTest

[jira] Commented: (DBCP-3) [dbcp] PoolableConnection.close() won't allow multiple close

2006-10-30 Thread Henri Yandell (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DBCP-3?page=comments#action_12445751 ] Henri Yandell commented on DBCP-3: -- Maybe time to branch 1.2.2 off and have trunk be 1.3? [dbcp] PoolableConnection.close() won't allow multiple close

[jira] Created: (LANG-292) unescapeXml(12345678;) should be 12345678;

2006-10-30 Thread Stepan Koltsov (JIRA)
unescapeXml(12345678;) should be 12345678; Key: LANG-292 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-292 Project: Commons Lang Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: Nightly Builds

[jira] Created: (LANG-293) StringEscapeUtils.unescape* can be faster

2006-10-30 Thread Stepan Koltsov (JIRA)
StringEscapeUtils.unescape* can be faster - Key: LANG-293 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-293 Project: Commons Lang Issue Type: Improvement Affects Versions: Nightly Builds

[jira] Updated: (LANG-293) StringEscapeUtils.unescape* can be faster

2006-10-30 Thread Stepan Koltsov (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-293?page=all ] Stepan Koltsov updated LANG-293: Attachment: commons-lang-unescape-performace2-stepancheg-2006-10-31.diff StringEscapeUtils.unescape* can be faster -

[jira] Updated: (LANG-293) StringEscapeUtils.unescape* can be faster

2006-10-30 Thread Stepan Koltsov (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-293?page=all ] Stepan Koltsov updated LANG-293: Attachment: EntitiesPerformance2TestSecret.java StringEscapeUtils.unescape* can be faster - Key:

[jira] Updated: (POOL-89) Inconsistency with TestGenericKeyedObjectPool.testMaxTotalLRU

2006-10-30 Thread Sandy McArthur (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/POOL-89?page=all ] Sandy McArthur updated POOL-89: --- Priority: Minor (was: Major) Inconsistency with TestGenericKeyedObjectPool.testMaxTotalLRU -

svn commit: r469364 - /jakarta/commons/proper/pool/trunk/src/test/org/apache/commons/pool/impl/TestGenericKeyedObjectPool.java

2006-10-30 Thread sandymac
Author: sandymac Date: Mon Oct 30 20:16:21 2006 New Revision: 469364 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=469364 Log: Less agressive timings to reduce the chance of thread scheduling causing the testMaxTotalLRU to fail. Changed in response to issue POOL-89 Modified:

[jira] Resolved: (POOL-89) Inconsistency with TestGenericKeyedObjectPool.testMaxTotalLRU

2006-10-30 Thread Sandy McArthur (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/POOL-89?page=all ] Sandy McArthur resolved POOL-89. Resolution: Fixed I've bumped the Thread.sleeps from 10 ms to 25 ms. Reopen this issue if that isn't enough to stop the false negatives. Inconsistency with

[jira] Commented: (COLLECTIONS-8) Comparator Predicate

2006-10-30 Thread Stepan Koltsov (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COLLECTIONS-8?page=comments#action_12445781 ] Stepan Koltsov commented on COLLECTIONS-8: -- I think, that such predicate should have only three criterions: 1, 0, -1, for greater, equals and less.

svn commit: r469372 - /jakarta/commons/proper/pool/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/pool/impl/GenericKeyedObjectPool.java

2006-10-30 Thread sandymac
Author: sandymac Date: Mon Oct 30 21:17:35 2006 New Revision: 469372 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=469372 Log: Use a struct instead of maintaining two Maps in parallel. Patch by Holger Hoffstätte from issue POOL-88 Modified:

[jira] Resolved: (POOL-88) Better maintenance of GKOP per-pool activeCount

2006-10-30 Thread Sandy McArthur (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/POOL-88?page=all ] Sandy McArthur resolved POOL-88. Fix Version/s: Nightly Builds Resolution: Fixed I applied your patch with minimal changes. Much thanks. Better maintenance of GKOP per-pool activeCount

[jira] Resolved: (FILEUPLOAD-117) Check file upload size only if an upload limit has been imposed

2006-10-30 Thread Jochen Wiedmann (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FILEUPLOAD-117?page=all ] Jochen Wiedmann resolved FILEUPLOAD-117. Fix Version/s: 1.2 Resolution: Fixed Version 1.2 does no longer depend on the presence of a ContentLength. Check file upload size

svn commit: r469386 - in /jakarta/commons/proper/fileupload/trunk: pom.xml src/changes/changes.xml src/java/org/apache/commons/fileupload/util/Streams.java

2006-10-30 Thread jochen
Author: jochen Date: Mon Oct 30 22:10:04 2006 New Revision: 469386 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=469386 Log: Made Streams.asString static. Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/fileupload/trunk/pom.xml jakarta/commons/proper/fileupload/trunk/src/changes/changes.xml

[jira] Commented: (POOL-86) GenericKeyedObjectPool retaining too many idle objects

2006-10-30 Thread Sandy McArthur (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/POOL-86?page=comments#action_12445798 ] Sandy McArthur commented on POOL-86: I think the changes you suggest to the evict method will fail to make forward progress if getNumTests() is less than the

svn commit: r469390 - /jakarta/commons/proper/pool/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/pool/PoolUtils.java

2006-10-30 Thread sandymac
Author: sandymac Date: Mon Oct 30 22:40:20 2006 New Revision: 469390 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=469390 Log: Added some checks to PoolUtils.synchronizedPool to warn of usage that isn't thread-safe when assertions are enabled. Modified:

[jira] Commented: (POOL-86) GenericKeyedObjectPool retaining too many idle objects

2006-10-30 Thread Sandy McArthur (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/POOL-86?page=comments#action_12445803 ] Sandy McArthur commented on POOL-86: Back to the first part of your original submission: What I understand you really want is a way to prune the pool size down

svn commit: r469396 - /jakarta/commons/proper/fileupload/trunk/pom.xml

2006-10-30 Thread jochen
Author: jochen Date: Mon Oct 30 23:31:46 2006 New Revision: 469396 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=469396 Log: The commons proper parent is now using the artifactId commons-parent. Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/fileupload/trunk/pom.xml Modified:

[jira] Commented: (COLLECTIONS-8) Comparator Predicate

2006-10-30 Thread JIRA
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COLLECTIONS-8?page=comments#action_12445811 ] Rune Peter Bjørnstad commented on COLLECTIONS-8: I disagree. Comparators are used in the JDK and Commons-Collections has its own comparators