On 2/10/07, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any reason not to release version 2 of the commons-parent pom?
Niall, I'd like to throw in my experiences from releasing the
commons-fileupload project. In particular, I would like to add the
rat-maven-plugin and the gpg-maven-plugin. Would
Niall Pemberton wrote:
Any reason not to release version 2 of the commons-parent pom?
No, I was going over what had changed the other night - nothing
controversial.
If not any volunteers?
I'll put together a list of changes and call for a vote.
--
Dennis Lundberg
Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
On 2/10/07, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any reason not to release version 2 of the commons-parent pom?
Niall, I'd like to throw in my experiences from releasing the
commons-fileupload project. In particular, I would like to add the
rat-maven-plugin and the
Hi Niall,
Niall Pemberton wrote:
I tried running the RAT[1] tool over the RC but invalid characters in
conf/testEncoding.xml caused RAT to fail[2] :-( Removing that file it
higlighted a licensing issue - MockStaticMemoryInitialContextFactory
has a Copyright The Spice Group and indicates
Henri Yandell wrote:
Going with RC3:
http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-io/1.3.1-rc3/
The only change is that I've fixed the manifest to say 1.3.1 and not 1.3.
[ ] +1
[ ] -1
Hen
+1 from me
- Jörg
-
To
Hi Jochen,
Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
On 2/9/07, Jörg Schaible [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
testProgressListener(org.apache.commons.fileupload.ProgressListenerTest):
FAILED
expected:-128 but was:-128
This sounds like two different kinds of objects with same values,
for example (short) -128 as
+1
We probably should mark the static changed method as @since 1.3.1, but
that is not a blocker.
Stephen
Henri Yandell wrote:
Going with RC3:
http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-io/1.3.1-rc3/
The only change is that I've fixed the manifest to say 1.3.1 and not 1.3.
[ ] +1
[ ] -1
On 2/10/07, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
On 2/10/07, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any reason not to release version 2 of the commons-parent pom?
Niall, I'd like to throw in my experiences from releasing the
commons-fileupload project. In
On 2/10/07, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Niall Pemberton wrote:
Any reason not to release version 2 of the commons-parent pom?
No, I was going over what had changed the other night - nothing
controversial.
If not any volunteers?
I'll put together a list of changes and call for a
On 2/10/07, Jörg Schaible [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Niall,
Niall Pemberton wrote:
I tried running the RAT[1] tool over the RC but invalid characters in
conf/testEncoding.xml caused RAT to fail[2] :-( Removing that file it
higlighted a licensing issue -
Niall Pemberton wrote:
On 2/10/07, Jörg Schaible [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Niall,
Niall Pemberton wrote:
I tried running the RAT[1] tool over the RC but invalid characters in
conf/testEncoding.xml caused RAT to fail[2] :-( Removing that file it
higlighted a licensing issue -
nicolas de loof wrote:
could CONFIGURATION-237 be considered for this release ?
Well, we can add these classes to the release, but I would prefer to
have some more documentation for it. Would it be possible for you to
provide a usage example, either in the header comment of the classes or
in a
Brett Porter wrote:
Hi,
I tested out 1.4 on some code I have using 1.3, which has some
expressions that resolve within the same configuration, but which is
located at a different prefix (via config-at). This broke under 1.4, as
it now assumes all interpolations need to happen in the
+1
Oliver
Henri Yandell wrote:
Here's the 3rd release candidate for Lang 2.3:
http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang/commons-lang-2.3-rc3/
Clirr, Jardiff + Site included.
[ ] +1
[ ] -1
Difference from RC2 is that the sources and javadoc jars now have
LICENSE/NOTICE files and the
Everything looks good, but I get the test failure below when building
with both ant and maven.
I am on Windows XP SP2. The problem occurred with JDK 1.5.0_09 and
1.6.0. Can anybody reproduce this?
Oliver
Testsuite: org.apache.commons.io.FileUtilsCleanDirectoryTestCase
Tests run: 4,
Hi, Jörg,
On 2/10/07, Jörg Schaible [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
well, I tried hard to find the cause for this, but failed so far. If you
look at the stack trace, it simply does not make sense also. Nevertheless
when I run the test from within Eclipse with the JRockit 1.5 runtime, the
On 2/10/07, Jochen Wiedmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/10/07, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any reason not to release version 2 of the commons-parent pom?
Niall, I'd like to throw in my experiences from releasing the
commons-fileupload project. In particular, I would like to add
On 2/10/07, Jörg Schaible [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Niall Pemberton wrote:
On 2/10/07, Jörg Schaible [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Niall,
Niall Pemberton wrote:
I tried running the RAT[1] tool over the RC but invalid characters in
conf/testEncoding.xml caused RAT to fail[2] :-( Removing
The following worked for me:
- Windows XP Pro SP2 + current patches
- Sun Java 1.6.0, 1.5.0_10 and 1.4.2_13
- Ant 1.6.5
- Maven 1.0.2
- ant clean dist test
- maven clean site:generate
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Oliver Heger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 10,
On 2/10/07, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They're not in the fileupload pom.xml - are they on SNAPSHOT versions
(knowing that both are kind of new, so not sure if they have fixed
versions)?
They are on the special branch that I have created for the 1.2
release. As I wrote in a
On Sat, 10 Feb 2007 17:49:39 +0100, Oliver Heger wrote:
Everything looks good, but I get the test failure below when building with
both ant and maven.
I am on Windows XP SP2. The problem occurred with JDK 1.5.0_09 and 1.6.0.
Can anybody reproduce this?
Oliver
Testsuite:
Worth following up for IO 1.4 (could you add it to JIRA?), but as it's
going to have been in 1.3, I'm not concerned about it being in 1.3.1.
Hen
On 2/10/07, Oliver Heger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Everything looks good, but I get the test failure below when building
with both ant and maven.
I
Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
Hi, Jörg,
On 2/10/07, Jörg Schaible [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
well, I tried hard to find the cause for this, but failed so far. If you
look at the stack trace, it simply does not make sense also. Nevertheless
when I run the test from within Eclipse with the JRockit
Author: jochen
Date: Sat Feb 10 13:35:17 2007
New Revision: 505770
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=505770
Log:
Workaround for a problem with the JRockit JRE.
Modified:
24 matches
Mail list logo
