On 5/22/07, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 21/05/07, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 21/05/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 5/21/07, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Are there any plans to implement a filename relativiser?
> > >
> > > i.e., given an absolute dir
On 21/05/07, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 21/05/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/21/07, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Are there any plans to implement a filename relativiser?
> >
> > i.e., given an absolute directory and absolute filename it would
> > return a rel
On 21/05/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/21/07, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are there any plans to implement a filename relativiser?
>
> i.e., given an absolute directory and absolute filename it would
> return a relative filename.
>
> e.g. (in Unix syntax):
>
> /a/b/c a
On 5/21/07, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Are there any plans to implement a filename relativiser?
i.e., given an absolute directory and absolute filename it would
return a relative filename.
e.g. (in Unix syntax):
/a/b/c and /a/b/c/d/e.txt => d/e.txt
and optionally:
/a/b/c/f and /a/b/c/d/
Are there any plans to implement a filename relativiser?
i.e., given an absolute directory and absolute filename it would
return a relative filename.
e.g. (in Unix syntax):
/a/b/c and /a/b/c/d/e.txt => d/e.txt
and optionally:
/a/b/c/f and /a/b/c/d/e.txt => ../d/e.txt
It does not look particu
