Hello!
Now nearly all tests runs successfully. Only the Sftp wont work due to
an ArrayOutOfBounceException
java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 1575945941
at com.jcraft.jsch.jce.SignatureDSA.verify(SignatureDSA.java:115)
at com.jcraft.jsch.jce.DHG1.next(DHG1.java:244)
at
Michael Davey wrote:
I will have a UMLinux test machine available in a couple of days.
Please give me
a shout if you want to test the image on another machine, or if you
need any other
help.
I do have a uml now running with the following configuration:
1) UML Kernel:
Mario Ivankovits wrote:
Well, i will start in installing the UML for testing on my machine.
It might take some while, i will post here when i am ready.
I will have a UMLinux test machine available in a couple of days.
Please give me
a shout if you want to test the image on another machine, or
Mario Ivankovits wrote:
What if we start by adding various configuration files to VFS to start
up your own test-server.
The configuration files should be based on:
1) Apache 2.0 (for http and webdav)
2) Samba 3.0 (for smb)
3) openssh 3.7 (for sftp)
4) vsftpd (for ftp) (well any other ftpd would
Michael Davey wrote:
What if we start by adding various configuration files to VFS to
start up your own test-server.
The configuration files should be based on:
1) Apache 2.0 (for http and webdav)
2) Samba 3.0 (for smb)
3) openssh 3.7 (for sftp)
4) vsftpd (for ftp) (well any other ftpd would do
Mario Ivankovits wrote:
Nice idea, fore sure.
But the protocols arent that simple. You could not simply present some
captured protocol snipplets. And even if you manage to do so, the test
should simulate the real life and therefore it should run against the
real server.
E.g. if there is a new
access (create files, dirs, set last mod time, file attributes ...)
So i think starting with configuration files to setup a local test
system is a good idea, if we exactly know what we want, we could try to
find a public vfs test server.
But how public should/could this server be?
Missuse
, but i think we need read/write
access (create files, dirs, set last mod time, file attributes ...)
So i think starting with configuration files to setup a local test
system is a good idea, if we exactly know what we want, we could try
to find a public vfs test server.
But how public should/could
Mario Ivankovits wrote:
Missuse as file-sharing point for some illegal material will be
possible then.
I thought about this and i think, if there is only 1MB (yes, i mean 1MB
not 1GB ;-) read-/writeable space availabe on such a server, then
missuse might not be attractive.
And also we could
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Just as a thought, is this something that could run under User-Mode Linux on
the new GUMP server when it is installed? Is this something that you would
want to add to automated tests under GUMP?
The Linux instance within an UML on the GUMP Server is not available
Beside this: my base question was where is the maintainer of VFS?
i have a couple of patches added to bugzilla which needs discussion
too - and hopefully get committed sometimes.
The maintainer is this Community. I haven't been paying too much
attention, but it seems that there is continued
matthew.hawthorne wrote:
I'd be more than willing to commit patches -- but the same problem
remains that Gary stated originally. The test environment is
difficult to set up, and we need an easier way.
That's why I mentioned the User-Mode Linux approach, after reading some of
the discussion.
Adam R. B. Jack schrieb:
I have a vested interest in wanting VFS to be well tested (for Depot Ruper)
so I'm game to see this...
Well, i will start in installing the UML for testing on my machine.
It might take some while, i will post here when i am ready.
Mario
Just as a thought, is this something that could run under User-Mode Linux on
the new GUMP server when it is installed? Is this something that you would
want to add to automated tests under GUMP?
See: http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/
http://usermodelinux.org/
AM
Subject: RE: [VFS] test server
Just as a thought, is this something that could run under User-Mode Linux
on
the new GUMP server when it is installed? Is this something that you
would
want to add to automated tests under GUMP?
See: http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/
http
Gary Gregory wrote:
I fiddle with it once in a while as we'd like to use it in our product.
Understand that testing VFS properly is a pain as one needs to set up a
WWW server, FTP server, etc.
Perhaps we could investigate the possibility of having a VFS test server
set up
permanently - that way
Michael Davey wrote:
I fiddle with it once in a while as we'd like to use it in our product.
Understand that testing VFS properly is a pain as one needs to set up a
WWW server, FTP server, etc.
Perhaps we could investigate the possibility of having a VFS test server
set up
permanently - that way
, 2004 14:58
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [VFS] test server
Michael Davey wrote:
I fiddle with it once in a while as we'd like to use it in our
product.
Understand that testing VFS properly is a pain as one needs to set
up a
WWW server, FTP server, etc.
Perhaps we could
matthew.hawthorne wrote:
The problem with these types of things is the variations in OS, FTP
servers, HTTP servers, etc. It's impossible to test all of them and
that's where the users are incredibly valuable. But, even if we could
say we're going to test with Apache 2.0 and some version of
19 matches
Mail list logo
