Mattias Jiderhamn wrote:
At 2005-07-18 01:27, Simon Kitching:
... or
cp ${real-1.0-jar} commons-cli-1.0b.jar
Yes.
The minimum necessary is:
cp ${real-1.0-jar} commons-cli-1.0.jar
The 1.0b is, like 1.0.1, not IMO actually needed. But if others really
want a specific named maven tag, then
At 2005-07-18 01:27, Simon Kitching:
On Sun, 2005-07-17 at 19:31 +0200, Mattias Jiderhamn wrote:
> Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> >Simon Kitching wrote:
> >>I am aware that a number of people have expressed doubt about whether
> >>there should *be* a 1.0.1 release while others have backed it. This v
On Sun, 2005-07-17 at 19:31 +0200, Mattias Jiderhamn wrote:
> Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> >Simon Kitching wrote:
> >>I am aware that a number of people have expressed doubt about whether
> >>there should *be* a 1.0.1 release while others have backed it. This vote
> >>is an opportunity to see which
On Sun, 2005-07-17 at 22:58 +0100, sebb wrote:
> On 17/07/05, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Simon Kitching wrote:
> > > I am aware that a number of people have expressed doubt about whether
> > > there should *be* a 1.0.1 release while others have backed it. This vote
> > > is a
On 17/07/05, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Simon Kitching wrote:
> > I am aware that a number of people have expressed doubt about whether
> > there should *be* a 1.0.1 release while others have backed it. This vote
> > is an opportunity to see which approach people want to go wit
Stephen Colebourne wrote:
Simon Kitching wrote:
I am aware that a number of people have expressed doubt about whether
there should *be* a 1.0.1 release while others have backed it. This vote
is an opportunity to see which approach people want to go with.
...
My preferred option is to just fix t
Simon Kitching wrote:
I am aware that a number of people have expressed doubt about whether
there should *be* a 1.0.1 release while others have backed it. This vote
is an opportunity to see which approach people want to go with.
Regrettably, I must -1 this unless I see an email authorising us t
Hi,
Notice of the availability of Release candidate 1 for CLI 1.0.1 was
posted a few days ago. As there have been no objections to the
*contents* of this release candidate, it seems time to put it to an
official vote.
I am aware that a number of people have expressed doubt about whether
there sho
