Done.
Sorry - thought I had done this on the original send.
On 12/16/05, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Remember to cc the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list Phil.
Hen
On 12/15/05, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The vote to release Jakarta Commons Math 1.1 has passed.
Here is the
Remember to cc the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list Phil.
Hen
On 12/15/05, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The vote to release Jakarta Commons Math 1.1 has passed.
Here is the final vote tally:
5 +1
Phil Steitz **
Niall Pemberton **
Martin van den Bemt **
Brent Worden *
Rahul Akolkar *
4
The vote to release Jakarta Commons Math 1.1 has passed.
Here is the final vote tally:
5 +1
Phil Steitz **
Niall Pemberton **
Martin van den Bemt **
Brent Worden *
Rahul Akolkar *
4 +0
Al Chou *
Jorg Schaible *
J.Pietschmann *
Michael Heuer
No negative votes
* Commons Committer
** Jakarta PMC
Phil Steitz wrote:
to call for another release vote,
+0
J.Pietschmann
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1 :)
Mvgr,
Martin
Phil Steitz wrote:
Once again, forgot my own +1
On 12/11/05, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1
-Rahul
On 12/12/05, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problems reported with math 1.1 RC4 have been fixed. I would like
to call for another release vote, based on the release candidate
available here:
http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/commons-math/1-1-rc5
Release notes are
On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 20:32 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 12/12/05, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is the manifest missing a Specification-Version?
Yes, as will be all of the maven-built jars, at least with the current
version of the maven jar pluglin. Interestingly, we find
+1
Niall
On 12/12/05, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problems reported with math 1.1 RC4 have been fixed. I would like
to call for another release vote, based on the release candidate
available here:
http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/commons-math/1-1-rc5
Release notes are here:
+0
Phil Steitz wrote:
The problems reported with math 1.1 RC4 have been fixed. I would like
to call for another release vote, based on the release candidate
available here:
http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/commons-math/1-1-rc5
Release notes are here:
+1
- Original Message -
From: Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Subject: [RE-VOTE] Release Commons Math 1.1
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 22:08:05 -0700
The problems reported with math 1.1 RC4 have been fixed. I would like
is the manifest missing a Specification-Version?
BTW i've just discovered that there's a Implementation-Vendor-Id in the
(http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/guide/jar/jar.html#Manifest%
20Specification). seems like a bit of a waste of space: what vendor
should us a name that isn't unique?
-
Once again, forgot my own +1
On 12/11/05, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problems reported with math 1.1 RC4 have been fixed. I would like
to call for another release vote, based on the release candidate
available here:
http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/commons-math/1-1-rc5
On 12/12/05, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is the manifest missing a Specification-Version?
Yes, as will be all of the maven-built jars, at least with the current
version of the maven jar pluglin. Interestingly, we find this in the
plugin source:
!--
+0
--- Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problems reported with math 1.1 RC4 have been fixed. I would like
to call for another release vote, based on the release candidate
available here:
http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/commons-math/1-1-rc5
Release notes are here:
---
[X] +1 I support this release and am willing to help
[ ] +0 I support this release but am unable to help
[ ] -0 I do not support this release
[ ] -1 I do not support this release, and here are my reasons
Thanks for the feedback, all taken in the right spirt :-)
Will roll another RC with the suggested changes.
Phil
On 12/7/05, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
P.S. Sorry it wasn't my intention to be -ve, I checked out math hoping to
vote +1. One thing I meant to mention - I was
This vote has not passed. Significant defects were identified with
RC4. I will fix these and create another release candidate, followed
by a new vote.
Thanks to all who reviewed the RC!
Phil
On 12/4/05, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There have been no problems reported with math 1.1
This vote is about to close. Pls [math] and other commons committers, weigh in.
Thanks!
Phil
On 12/4/05, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There have been no problems reported with math 1.1 RC4, other than some
small javadoc fixes, which have been applied to the release branch.
Assuming
-0
RandomDataTest#testConfig() assumes SUN will be available as a
provider for the SHA-1 PRNG. Depending on your JDK, this may cause
test (and therefore, build) failures (as it did on one of my
machines). I understand this is *not* a [math] issue, but IMO, it will
be good if the test case can
---
[X] +1 I support this release and am willing to help
[ ] +0 I support this release but am unable to help
[ ] -0 I do not support this release
[ ] -1 I do not support this release, and here are my reasons
On 12/7/05, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-0
RandomDataTest#testConfig() assumes SUN will be available as a
provider for the SHA-1 PRNG. Depending on your JDK, this may cause
test (and therefore, build) failures (as it did on one of my
machines). I understand this is *not* a [math]
Phil Steitz wrote:
[X] +0 I support this release but am unable to help
Sorry, no time at hand for helping you.
J.Pietschmann
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1 non-binding
On 12/7/05, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This vote is about to close. Pls [math] and other commons committers, weigh
in.
Thanks!
Phil
On 12/4/05, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There have been no problems reported with math 1.1 RC4, other than some
small
Only checked the release notes so far, but you have Fraction class in
both New features and Changes which seem to conflict (you can't fix
something in an unreleased class!)
Stephen
Phil Steitz wrote:
This vote is about to close. Pls [math] and other commons committers, weigh in.
Thanks!
I'm -1 on this release candidate. The maven.xml is not up to date - it
doesn't have the change that was made to include the checkstyle.xml and
license-header.txt files in the source distro and hence those files are
not in RC4 source distro and the maven.xml is the wrong version. I've looked
at
P.S. Sorry it wasn't my intention to be -ve, I checked out math hoping to
vote +1. One thing I meant to mention - I was impressed with the Math User
Guide and I think it raises the bar for other components :-)
Niall
- Original Message -
From: Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
+1
Although I am not the best judge of the Math component, everything looks pretty much
complete (eg lot of tests, all tests pass) and I am very impressed with the message
zarro bugs in bugzilla :)
And another note : don't forget to vote yourself Phil :)
Mvgr,
Martin
Phil Steitz wrote:
Thanks Martin!
And thanks for the reminder. Here is my +1
Phil
On 12/5/05, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
Although I am not the best judge of the Math component, everything looks
pretty much complete (eg lot of tests, all tests pass) and I am very
impressed with the
Looks good (now that I made some experience with checking RCs on my own ;-)
The only thing I find a bit strange is that the manifest says the jar
was built with JDK 1.4.2_08 while the minimum required JDK seems to be
1.3 (stated in section 0.5 of the user guide). Is this okay? Then I am +1.
+0
Phil Steitz wrote:
There have been no problems reported with math 1.1 RC4, other than some
small javadoc fixes, which have been applied to the release branch.
Assuming a positive vote, I will cut a new signed release, including
these fixes.
Release notes are here:
There have been no problems reported with math 1.1 RC4, other than some
small javadoc fixes, which have been applied to the release branch.
Assuming a positive vote, I will cut a new signed release, including
these fixes.
Release notes are here:
Thanks for carrying the ball on this release, Phil. Here's my +0 (sorry, too
swamped with everything else in my life!).
Al
--- Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There have been no problems reported with math 1.1 RC4, other than some
small javadoc fixes, which have been applied to the
On 9/1/05, Brent Worden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Phil Steitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2005 7:52 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Math 1.1
b) text files, including the NOTICE
Sorry, guys, but I am now seeing 36450 (which showed up just after this VOTE
kicked off) as a show-stopper. I will fix this and roll a new RC (including
line-ending fix) and kick off a new VOTE this weekend.
Phil
On 9/1/05, Al Chou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 18:59 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
--8-
[X] +1 Release Math 1.1
[ ] +0 General support but not definitive
[ ] -0 Unhappy about the release but not definitive
[ ] -1 Do not release Math 1.1
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [VOTE] Release Commons Math 1.1
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 01:59:36 GMT
Raw Message Prev Next Prev by Thread Next by Thread
Please download and test the (hopefully final) Commons Math 1.1 release
candidate here:
http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/commons-math/1-1-rc2
Phil Steitz wrote:
--8-
[ ] +1 Release Math 1.1
[ ] +0 General support but not definitive
[X] -0 Unhappy about the release but not definitive
[ ] -1 Do not release Math 1.1
-0
a) My
+1
On 8/30/05, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please download and test the (hopefully final) Commons Math 1.1 release
candidate here:
http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/commons-math/1-1-rc2/
The following bug fixes have been made since 1.1 RC1:
* Added protection against
On 9/1/05, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Phil Steitz wrote:
--8-
[ ] +1 Release Math 1.1
[ ] +0 General support but not definitive
[X] -0 Unhappy about the release but not definitive
[ ] -1 Do not release
-Original Message-
From: Phil Steitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2005 7:52 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Math 1.1
b) text files, including the NOTICE and LICENSE use Unix line endings.
This is a debated
Commons Math 1.1
b) text files, including the NOTICE and LICENSE use Unix line endings.
This is a debated point, but I always prefer to see at
least the zips
use Windows line endings.
Anyone know how to fix this?
How about adding a call to Ant's fixcrlf task inside our
--- Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--8-
[ ] +1 Release Math 1.1
[X] +0 General support but not definitive
[ ] -0 Unhappy about the release but not definitive
[ ] -1 Do not release Math 1.1
I regret and apologize for not
Please download and test the (hopefully final) Commons Math 1.1 release
candidate here:
http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/commons-math/1-1-rc2/
The following bug fixes have been made since 1.1 RC1:
* Added protection against numerical overflow and underflow in the
isBracketing method (BZ
43 matches
Mail list logo
