Henri Yandell wrote:
So unless any of the non-versioned issues seem like they should go in,
it's time to start the fun of the release process.
Hen
Should I prepare a summary of the non-versioned issues? What else can I
do to push the release process?
Alan Canon
On 11/7/06, Alan Canon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
So unless any of the non-versioned issues seem like they should go in,
it's time to start the fun of the release process.
Hen
Should I prepare a summary of the non-versioned issues?
Only if you think any should go in 1.1.
On 11/7/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/7/06, Alan Canon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
So unless any of the non-versioned issues seem like they should go in,
it's time to start the fun of the release process.
Hen
Should I prepare a summary of the
Henri Yandell wrote:
http://people.apache.org/~bayard/dbutils-1.0-to-1.1-jardiff.html
It doesn't look that bad - jardiff complains that we've moved a method
into a superclass in a few places. So a recompile will be needed (I
think) rather than being able to drop the jar in place.
You might
On 11/7/06, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
http://people.apache.org/~bayard/dbutils-1.0-to-1.1-jardiff.html
It doesn't look that bad - jardiff complains that we've moved a method
into a superclass in a few places. So a recompile will be needed (I
think)
On 11/7/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/7/06, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
http://people.apache.org/~bayard/dbutils-1.0-to-1.1-jardiff.html
It doesn't look that bad - jardiff complains that we've moved a method
into a superclass in a
On 11/7/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/7/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/7/06, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
http://people.apache.org/~bayard/dbutils-1.0-to-1.1-jardiff.html
It doesn't look that bad - jardiff
