-
From: Eric Pugh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 25, 2004 11:35 PM
Cc: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: RE: [email] Dumbster failing
Not a problem. I appreciate your working with me on this.
I am looking
forward to getting [email] whipped into shape!
ERi
AM
To: 'Jakarta Commons Developers List'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Validator inside of Email.java (RE: [email] Dumbster failing)
Hi Eric,
I just update my email sources.
and looked abit on the patches
you are submitting. Cool to have
some unittest.
Btw. I saw that EmailValidator
Matthias,
I definately agree with you, inputs (emails in this case) should be
validated before submission to a low level api such as [email].
However I added the validation just to make sure. I guess you could
call it 'defensive' coding. I am happy to remove this and numerous
other input
!
-Original Message-
From: Matthias Wessendorf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 9:25 AM
To: 'Jakarta Commons Developers List'
Subject: RE: Validator inside of Email.java (RE: [email] Dumbster
failing)
Want to say:
A object represented by a clazz (subclass
- Original Message -
From: Eric Pugh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So, on the second side.. I guess, to what extent do we validate email
information? I agree that requiring commons-validator seems a bit much
for
a small project like [email] just to use it. On the other hand, it does
wrap the
I believe the code for email validation is not too much (certainly
less than the whole of validator package). Are you thinking of
duplicating it in place of the validation reference or removing the
validation from the functions and providing a validation function?
Either of which should not be
(RE: [email] Dumbster
failing)
Matthias,
I definately agree with you, inputs (emails in this case) should be
validated before submission to a low level api such as [email].
However I added the validation just to make sure. I guess you could
call it 'defensive' coding. I am happy to remove
: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 9:09 AM
To: 'Jakarta Commons Developers List'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Validator inside of Email.java (RE: [email] Dumbster
failing)
Hi Eric,
I just update my email sources.
and looked abit on the patches
you are submitting. Cool to have
Message-
From: Eric Pugh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 25, 2004 11:35 PM
Cc: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: RE: [email] Dumbster failing
Not a problem. I appreciate your working with me on this.
I am looking
forward to getting [email] whipped
So have we reached a concensus on all of this?
To summarize:
-Validation should NOT be included in the current version
-This issue will be revisited after the release
-The current functionality is appropriate AS IS
-The major targets we have now prior to a first release are:
1) Complete the Unit
! We'll get there! It's nice to see new life in [email].
Eric
-Original Message-
From: Corey Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 25, 2004 5:11 AM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [email] Dumbster failing
Ok, I will switch my build to maven from
Ok, I have the tests all up and running with Maven.
I have also made some minor mods, based on the tests or improving the
input checking (this is why some of the tests are failing, there where
against my changes not the HEAD version sorry)
So once we get this formatting issue sorted, I will
List
Subject: Re: [email] Dumbster failing
Ok, I have the tests all up and running with Maven.
I have also made some minor mods, based on the tests or improving the
input checking (this is why some of the tests are failing, there where
against my changes not the HEAD version sorry)
So
Hi all,
I am getting some java security issues with the current unit tests and
dumbster. Can any one else (corey ;-) ) verify that they work properly? I
thought it was my SMTP server, but I stopped that.
Eric
-
To
Ok, I will switch my build to maven from Ant (although Maven seemed
not to like dumbster too much last time I tried it). I will get the
get the tests going and resubmit.
I think I'm going to have to start again from the cvs, cause my code
tree is becoming too different from the committed one. I
15 matches
Mail list logo
