[ 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONFIGURATION-217?page=comments#action_12417890
 ] 

Oliver Heger commented on CONFIGURATION-217:
--------------------------------------------

We have discussed this issue on the developers' list with some maven experts. 
Here is a link to this thread:

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=jakarta-commons-dev&m=115117131729595&w=2

Outcome is that once released POMs should not be changed afterwards. I hope 
that the 1.3 release of Commons Configuration 1.3 won't be too far in future. 
Then we can update the dependency to Servlet API 2.4.

> Possible Maven2 POM dependency clash for Servlet-API
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>          Key: CONFIGURATION-217
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONFIGURATION-217
>      Project: Commons Configuration
>         Type: Bug

>     Versions: 1.2 Final
>  Environment: Maven 2.0.4
> Windows XP
>     Reporter: Christoph Cenowa
>     Priority: Minor

>
> As described by ASF bug #33476 Commons Configurations shall depend on 
> Servlet-API 2.4. The current Maven2 POM of Commons Configuration 1.2 shows a 
> dependency on Servlet-API 2.3. This is not only a mismatch between Commons 
> Configurations' build configuration and its Maven2 POM but also prevents 
> Maven2 projects from using the Servlet-API 2.4 if also using Commons 
> Configuration 1.2.
> Could it be possible to fix Commons Configuration 1.2's Maven2 POM to include 
> a dependency on Servlet-API 2.4, please?
> With best regards, Christoph
> P.S.: My thanks for the quick fix of the Commons Collection dependency 
> problem within Commons Configuration.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to