I think this is definitely a step in the right direction,
but that the ultimate strategy you've outlined is still
a little confusing.
Basically, we currently have two categories of decorator
classes:
1. Things like ComparatorUtils, that provide a variety
of decorator functionality for the
PM
Subject: RE: [Collections] Naming conventions [was ComparableComparator -
nulls OK]
I think this is definitely a step in the right direction,
but that the ultimate strategy you've outlined is still
a little confusing.
Basically, we currently have two categories of decorator
classes:
1
On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
If we do this right, some of the current top level classes (eg.iterators)
could be deprecated and become merged into a factory style class, to the
benefit of the interface size.
Well thats my input (sorry for the long email!). We could really
