Re: [IO] Move to a minimum of JDK 1.4?

2007-05-20 Thread Jörg Schaible
Stephen Colebourne wrote: I would expect a JDK change to be a major version number change. It not that you can commons-io no longer use with JDK 1.3 it is inly that you simply can no longer use any part of it. This works for other libs quite perfectly, why should c-io be an exception? - Jörg

Re: [IO] Move to a minimum of JDK 1.4?

2007-05-19 Thread Stephen Colebourne
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007 1:10 PM To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [IO] Move to a minimum of JDK 1.4? On 5/15/07, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There are a couple of Jira tickets which require JDK 1.4 IO-74[1] - Regular Expression IOFileFilter

Re: [IO] Move to a minimum of JDK 1.4?

2007-05-18 Thread Stephen Colebourne
My preference would be to support JDK1.3 and JDK1.5 versions, rather than JDK1.4. If desired, these calls can be implemented using reflection, so they work on JDK1.4 but not on JDK1.3. Stephen Niall Pemberton wrote: There are a couple of Jira tickets which require JDK 1.4 IO-74[1] -

Re: [IO] Move to a minimum of JDK 1.4?

2007-05-18 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On 5/18/07, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My preference would be to support JDK1.3 and JDK1.5 versions, rather than JDK1.4. I do not understand your intention. Jochen -- My cats know that I am a loser who goes out for hunting every day without ever returning as much as a

Re: [IO] Move to a minimum of JDK 1.4?

2007-05-18 Thread Niall Pemberton
On 5/18/07, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My preference would be to support JDK1.3 and JDK1.5 versions, rather than JDK1.4. When you say support do you mean two active versions under development or the moving the main development to JDK 1.5 with a JDK 1.3 branch mainly for bug

Re: [IO] Move to a minimum of JDK 1.4?

2007-05-18 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 5/15/07, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There are a couple of Jira tickets which require JDK 1.4 IO-74[1] - Regular Expression IOFileFilter implementation IO-77[2] - FileUtils.move() method that uses NIO Are there any objections to moving Commons IO's minimum requirement to JDK

RE: [IO] Move to a minimum of JDK 1.4?

2007-05-18 Thread Gary Gregory
Subject: Re: [IO] Move to a minimum of JDK 1.4? On 5/15/07, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There are a couple of Jira tickets which require JDK 1.4 IO-74[1] - Regular Expression IOFileFilter implementation IO-77[2] - FileUtils.move() method that uses NIO Are there any

RE: [IO] Move to a minimum of JDK 1.4?

2007-05-16 Thread Gary Gregory
+1 here (Selfish POV: The product I work on now requires Java 1.4 already) Thank you, Gary -Original Message- From: Niall Pemberton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 8:05 PM To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: [IO] Move to a minimum of JDK 1.4? There