TCCL will do for many
cases.
Thanks,
Dimitry
-Original Message-
From: robert burrell donkin
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2006 2:56 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: RE: logging, TCCL JCL 1.0.5 alpha
On Fri, 2005-12-23 at 15:37 -0800, Voytenko, Dmytro
On Fri, 2005-12-23 at 15:37 -0800, Voytenko, Dmytro wrote:
Or even better, don't deploy classes in shared locations. I
personally
believe this is not good design; applications in a container are meant
This is probably the point on which a lot of people can argue in both
ways.
On Fri, 2005-12-23 at 15:51 -0800, Voytenko, Dmytro wrote:
Hi Simon,
Could you also point me to the FAQ you're describing? I just searched
FAQ on JCL wikis and didn't find that recommendations. I'd like to use
it for reference.
seems to have gone missing :-/
anyone know where it's gone?
in this case. Does this make sense?
Thanks,
Dimitry
-Original Message-
From: Simon Kitching [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2005 3:15 AM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: logging, TCCL JCL 1.0.5 alpha
Hi Dimitry,
On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 16:32 -0800, Voytenko
On Fri, 2005-12-23 at 12:49 -0800, Voytenko, Dmytro wrote:
Hi Simon,
Thanks for the prompt response.
I reviewed the code in the trunc and it looked fine. I'm planning to run
it through the unit tests we have. Unfortunetely, some of the problems
are hard to establish in the Junit
Message-
From: Simon Kitching [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 23, 2005 1:33 PM
To: Voytenko, Dmytro
Cc: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: RE: logging, TCCL JCL 1.0.5 alpha
On Fri, 2005-12-23 at 12:49 -0800, Voytenko, Dmytro wrote:
Hi Simon,
Thanks for the prompt
3:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: RE: logging, TCCL JCL 1.0.5 alpha
Hi Simon,
The use of static fields for loggers in a class that may be shared is
a
known issue and is described in the FAQ. The answer is to *not* use
static fields; make the logger
Hi Dimitry,
On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 16:32 -0800, Voytenko, Dmytro wrote:
Hi,
I'm sorry for repeating the subject if it was discussed already, but I
couldn't find an archive search.
This email is regarding numerous problems with JCL in multi-class-loader
environments. This seems to be a
Hi,
I'm sorry for repeating the subject if it was discussed already, but I couldn't
find an archive search.
This email is regarding numerous problems with JCL in multi-class-loader
environments. This seems to be a rather critical issue. I just got a chance to
take a look into changes for JCL
