[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2005-10-28 Thread commons-jelly development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2005-10-28 Thread commons-jelly development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-xml-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2005-10-28 Thread commons-jelly-tags-xml development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-xml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-xml-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2005-10-28 Thread commons-jelly-tags-xml development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-xml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2005-10-28 Thread commons-jelly-tags-define development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test has an issue affecting its community

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2005-10-28 Thread commons-jelly-tags-define development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test has an issue affecting its community

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2005-10-28 Thread commons-jelly-tags-jsl development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test has an issue affecting its community integration.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2005-10-28 Thread commons-jelly-tags-jsl development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test has an issue affecting its community integration.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-html (in module commons-jelly) failed

2005-10-28 Thread commons-jelly-tags-html development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-html has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-html (in module commons-jelly) failed

2005-10-28 Thread commons-jelly-tags-html development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-html has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-latka (in module jakarta-commons) failed

2005-10-28 Thread Ted Husted
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-latka has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-latka (in module jakarta-commons) failed

2005-10-28 Thread Ted Husted
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-latka has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-swing (in module commons-jelly) failed

2005-10-28 Thread JellySwing development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-swing has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-swing (in module commons-jelly) failed

2005-10-28 Thread JellySwing development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-swing has an issue affecting its community integration. This

RE: [configuration] PropertiesConfiguration include functionality broken

2005-10-28 Thread Lewis, Cory \(Genworth\)
Lewis, Cory (Genworth) schrieb: Hi. I believe I've found a bug in commons-configuration 1.1. Basically, PropertiesConfiguration will not actually include files in an include directive until the original properties file has been reloaded. An example: [prefs.properties]

[transaction] transactional file access

2005-10-28 Thread Joerg Heinicke
Hello, I saw that commons transaction provides an implementation of transactional file access and an abstract implementation of javax.transaction.xa.XAResource. Now I wonder why these two are not combined and the transactional file access implementation does not exist as a XAResource. Is it so

Re: [transaction] transactional file access

2005-10-28 Thread Oliver Zeigermann
Hi Jörg, I do not think it should be too difficult, but what would be the real benefit? The XA resource would store files locally only and a real 2 phase commit does not work with the transactional file system. Anyway, if you have a decent running implementation of that and want to donate it to

Re: [transaction] transactional file access

2005-10-28 Thread Joerg Heinicke
Oliver Zeigermann oliver.zeigermann at gmail.com writes: I do not think it should be too difficult, but what would be the real benefit? The XA resource would store files locally only and a real 2 phase commit does not work with the transactional file system. I guess it is less a question of

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37293] New: - [configuration] Output format of FielConfiguration classes

2005-10-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37293. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37293] - [configuration] Output format of FielConfiguration classes

2005-10-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37293. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37293] - [configuration] Output format of FielConfiguration classes

2005-10-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37293. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: [transaction] transactional file access

2005-10-28 Thread Oliver Zeigermann
2005/10/28, Joerg Heinicke [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Oliver Zeigermann oliver.zeigermann at gmail.com writes: I do not think it should be too difficult, but what would be the real benefit? The XA resource would store files locally only and a real 2 phase commit does not work with the

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37210] - [logging] Can't find commons-logging-optional.jar

2005-10-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37210. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37243] - [lang] DateUtils.truncate method is buggy when dealing with DST switching hours

2005-10-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37243. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37249] - [resources] Objects to be prevented from removal from JCS Cache

2005-10-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37249. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37258] - [vfs] SFTF exception when using getChildren()

2005-10-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37258. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37293] - [configuration] Output format of FileConfiguration classes

2005-10-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37293. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

svn commit: r329269 - in /jakarta/commons/proper/configuration/trunk: src/java/org/apache/commons/configuration/XMLConfiguration.java src/test/org/apache/commons/configuration/TestXMLConfiguration.jav

2005-10-28 Thread oheger
Author: oheger Date: Fri Oct 28 11:51:39 2005 New Revision: 329269 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=329269view=rev Log: Updated XMLConfiguration to output the set encoding in the generated xml documents. Thanks to Kay Doebl for the patch. Modified:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37293] - [configuration] Output format of FileConfiguration classes

2005-10-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37293. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

svn commit: r329277 - /jakarta/commons/proper/lang/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/lang/time/DurationFormatUtils.java

2005-10-28 Thread ggregory
Author: ggregory Date: Fri Oct 28 12:49:47 2005 New Revision: 329277 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=329277view=rev Log: Minor Javadoc (style.) Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/lang/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/lang/time/DurationFormatUtils.java Modified:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2005-10-28 Thread commons-jelly-tags-define development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test has an issue affecting its community

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2005-10-28 Thread commons-jelly-tags-define development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test has an issue affecting its community

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2005-10-28 Thread commons-jelly-tags-jsl development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test has an issue affecting its community integration.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2005-10-28 Thread commons-jelly-tags-jsl development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test has an issue affecting its community integration.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-html (in module commons-jelly) failed

2005-10-28 Thread commons-jelly-tags-html development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-html has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-html (in module commons-jelly) failed

2005-10-28 Thread commons-jelly-tags-html development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-html has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-swing (in module commons-jelly) failed

2005-10-28 Thread JellySwing development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-swing has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-swing (in module commons-jelly) failed

2005-10-28 Thread JellySwing development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-swing has an issue affecting its community integration. This

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37296] New: - [jci] GroovyJavaCompiler assumes extensions end in .java

2005-10-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37296. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37299] New: - JXPathContext.iteratePointers(//*) results are incorrect

2005-10-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37299. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37299] - JXPathContext.iteratePointers(//*) results are incorrect

2005-10-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37299. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37299] - JXPathContext.iteratePointers(//*) results are incorrect

2005-10-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37299. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37300] New: - Int validation in Java and Javascript have different semantics

2005-10-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37300. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.