[validator] bug in EmailValidator ?

2006-01-25 Thread Nicolas De Loof
EmailValidator.getInstance().isValid(test@ + '\t' + foo.com) returns true. I don't think use of blanks between @ and domain is valid for eMails. Perhaps SPECIAL_CHARS needs to include blanks ? Nico. This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-logging (in module jakarta-commons) failed

2006-01-25 Thread Ted Husted
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-logging has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-logging (in module jakarta-commons) failed

2006-01-25 Thread Ted Husted
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-logging has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38381] New: - __openDataConnection doesnot close ServerSocket after server.accept() timesout

2006-01-25 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38381. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: [validator] bug in EmailValidator ?

2006-01-25 Thread Niall Pemberton
Thanks, this was reported in Bug 38051 and fixed recently http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38051 Niall On 1/25/06, Nicolas De Loof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: EmailValidator.getInstance().isValid(test@ + '\t' + foo.com) returns true. I don't think use of blanks

Re: Encryption - Common HTTP client

2006-01-25 Thread Oleg Kalnichevski
On Wed, 2006-01-25 at 10:50 +0530, PARVEEN GARG (GR/EIL) wrote: Hello all, I have a question regarding encryption and export control. Does Apache, Commons HTTPclient include any SW encryption that restricts export (i.e. special ECCN code)? Best Regards, Parveen Garg Parveen, Commons

Re: svn commit: r371566 - in /jakarta/commons/proper: attributes/trunk/ beanutils/trunk/ betwixt/trunk/ chain/trunk/ cli/trunk/ codec/trunk/ collections/trunk/ configuration/trunk/ daemon/trunk/ dbcp/

2006-01-25 Thread Bindul Bhowmik
Hello list, On 1/24/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 1/23/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: bayard Date: Mon Jan 23 08:12:55 2006 New Revision: 371566 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=371566view=rev Log: Adding doap files for each component

RE: [jelly][vote] APT tag library

2006-01-25 Thread Ryan Heaton
This issue and proposal has been in JIRA now for about a month. Activity (perhaps interest) has been minimal. At this point, I'm not sure what to do. Those who have shown interest have been positive about the proposal. Can (should) we reinitiate the vote? Are the votes that have been

Re: [net] JSSE classes in FTPS WAS Re: [net] FTPS submission - legal issues

2006-01-25 Thread Martin van den Bemt
Just use jsse. I didn't have any problems with them under jdk1.3. Running that stuff under jdk1.3 should also work like charm. Mvgr, Martin Steve Cohen wrote: Rory Winston wrote: Ive come across the com.sun.* issue before. They are part of the JVM, just not officially documented for public

[all] src-ide and javadoc-ide?

2006-01-25 Thread robert burrell donkin
IIRC good reasons were put forward a while ago for starting to distribute jars aimed at IDE users. src-ide.zip would contain compressed source and javadoc-ide.zip javadocs. (or similar names) these should contain LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt. a META-INF directory sounds like a good place to store

Re: [all] src-ide and javadoc-ide?

2006-01-25 Thread Martin van den Bemt
I just normally use the zip / tar.gz to link the source (or checkout the project and depend on that). So for me : don't invest too much time on this :) Mvgr, Martin robert burrell donkin wrote: IIRC good reasons were put forward a while ago for starting to distribute jars aimed at IDE users.

Re: [all] src-ide and javadoc-ide?

2006-01-25 Thread Dennis Lundberg
robert burrell donkin wrote: IIRC good reasons were put forward a while ago for starting to distribute jars aimed at IDE users. src-ide.zip would contain compressed source and javadoc-ide.zip javadocs. (or similar names) these should contain LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt. a META-INF directory

Re: [all] src-ide and javadoc-ide?

2006-01-25 Thread Dennis Lundberg
robert burrell donkin wrote: IIRC good reasons were put forward a while ago for starting to distribute jars aimed at IDE users. src-ide.zip would contain compressed source and javadoc-ide.zip javadocs. (or similar names) these should contain LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt. a META-INF directory

svn commit: r372283 - /jakarta/commons/proper/logging/trunk/build.xml

2006-01-25 Thread rdonkin
Author: rdonkin Date: Wed Jan 25 10:41:55 2006 New Revision: 372283 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=372283view=rev Log: Added source and javadoc archives for IDEs to distribution build. Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/logging/trunk/build.xml Modified:

[Jakarta-commons Wiki] Update of MathWishList by CarlManaster

2006-01-25 Thread Apache Wiki
Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Jakarta-commons Wiki for change notification. The following page has been changed by CarlManaster: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/MathWishList

Re: [all] src-ide and javadoc-ide?

2006-01-25 Thread Henri Yandell
For the ide's, can they be in the same jar? What's the advantage of the jar over the zip? The ide can use the jar without unpacking? Hen On 1/25/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: IIRC good reasons were put forward a while ago for starting to distribute jars aimed at IDE

[logging] compatibility with JCL 1.0.2

2006-01-25 Thread robert burrell donkin
Log4JCategoryLog has been deprecated since 1.0.3. however, 1.0.2 is still in wide circulation and that mean anyone who specifies Log4JCategoryLog in a commons-logging.properties will find that the latest jar is no longer a drop in substitution (since Log4JCategoryLog has been removed from the

svn commit: r372295 - /jakarta/commons/proper/logging/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/logging/impl/LogFactoryImpl.java

2006-01-25 Thread rdonkin
Author: rdonkin Date: Wed Jan 25 11:16:03 2006 New Revision: 372295 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=372295view=rev Log: Improved exception message. This should allow users who add whitespace to easily see that they've made a mistake. Modified:

Re: [all] src-ide and javadoc-ide?

2006-01-25 Thread robert burrell donkin
On Wed, 2006-01-25 at 14:04 -0500, Henri Yandell wrote: For the ide's, can they be in the same jar? not sure if they can but it sounds like a good idea :) What's the advantage of the jar over the zip? The ide can use the jar without unpacking? not sure i understand. i was sort of using zip

Re: [all] src-ide and javadoc-ide?

2006-01-25 Thread robert burrell donkin
On Wed, 2006-01-25 at 19:41 +0100, Dennis Lundberg wrote: robert burrell donkin wrote: IIRC good reasons were put forward a while ago for starting to distribute jars aimed at IDE users. src-ide.zip would contain compressed source and javadoc-ide.zip javadocs. (or similar names) these

Re: [logging] compatibility with JCL 1.0.2

2006-01-25 Thread Martin van den Bemt
Sounds like a wise thing to do indeed, although you probably are a better judge of the issues that may arise when not doing this.. Probably the fact that you wrote a mail about it, there must be a doubt and when in doubt, taking the safe route is probably better.. Mvgr, Martin robert burrell

Re: [logging] compatibility with JCL 1.0.2

2006-01-25 Thread Dennis Lundberg
robert burrell donkin wrote: Log4JCategoryLog has been deprecated since 1.0.3. however, 1.0.2 is still in wide circulation and that mean anyone who specifies Log4JCategoryLog in a commons-logging.properties will find that the latest jar is no longer a drop in substitution (since Log4JCategoryLog

Re: Which Maven / xdoc-plugin version to build component site?

2006-01-25 Thread Phil Steitz
On 1/24/06, Simon Kitching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 2006-01-24 at 20:42 -0500, Rahul Akolkar wrote: On 1/24/06, Jörg Schaible [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi folks, which version of Maven and the xdoc-plugin is necessary to build the site of a component? Building for

Re: [jelly][vote] APT tag library

2006-01-25 Thread Paul Libbrecht
Dear Ryan, I am sorry nothing more has happened. At this point, as of me, i am stuck into the fact that I develop on places where Java 1.5 is not available and have very little experience of it. If some other jelly committers do not show an interest to it, I am afraid I will have to suggest

Re: [all] src-ide and javadoc-ide?

2006-01-25 Thread Simon Kitching
On Wed, 2006-01-25 at 19:23 +, robert burrell donkin wrote: On Wed, 2006-01-25 at 19:41 +0100, Dennis Lundberg wrote: robert burrell donkin wrote: IIRC good reasons were put forward a while ago for starting to distribute jars aimed at IDE users. src-ide.zip would contain compressed

Re: [all] src-ide and javadoc-ide?

2006-01-25 Thread Martin van den Bemt
I was hoping that if/when we start working on a new logging version (2.0?) we would move to maven2 By the way, I'm off on holiday tomorrow, so will be unsubscribing from the list shortly. See you all on the 7th of feb. Good luck with the release process! Enjoy your holiday ! Mvgr,

[Jakarta-commons Wiki] Update of CreatingSiteWithMaven2 by DennisLundberg

2006-01-25 Thread Apache Wiki
Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Jakarta-commons Wiki for change notification. The following page has been changed by DennisLundberg: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/CreatingSiteWithMaven2 The comment on the change is: Maven 2.0.2 has been released.

Re: [all] src-ide and javadoc-ide?

2006-01-25 Thread robert burrell donkin
On Wed, 2006-01-25 at 22:08 +0100, Martin van den Bemt wrote: I was hoping that if/when we start working on a new logging version (2.0?) we would move to maven2 By the way, I'm off on holiday tomorrow, so will be unsubscribing from the list shortly. See you all on the 7th of

[Jakarta-commons Wiki] Trivial Update of CreatingSiteWithMaven2 by JamesRing

2006-01-25 Thread Apache Wiki
Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Jakarta-commons Wiki for change notification. The following page has been changed by JamesRing: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/CreatingSiteWithMaven2 The comment on the change is: s/meny/menu/

svn commit: r372373 - in /jakarta/commons/proper/collections/trunk: RELEASE-NOTES.html project.xml src/java/org/apache/commons/collections/MultiHashMap.java

2006-01-25 Thread scolebourne
Author: scolebourne Date: Wed Jan 25 16:10:43 2006 New Revision: 372373 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=372373view=rev Log: Enable MultiHashMap compilation on J# Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/collections/trunk/RELEASE-NOTES.html

Re: MultiHashMap modified..

2006-01-25 Thread Stephen Colebourne
Change applied. thanks Stephen Robert Ribnitz wrote: Hello List, for a project of ours, which uses the Apache Commons collections, I need to make those runnable in a .NET/J# context. I have therefore Modified MuliHashMap. I have added a private Method in the outer class, that can be

Re: [all] src-ide and javadoc-ide?

2006-01-25 Thread Stephen Colebourne
robert burrell donkin wrote: IIRC good reasons were put forward a while ago for starting to distribute jars aimed at IDE users. src-ide.zip would contain compressed source and javadoc-ide.zip javadocs. (or similar names) commons-io-1.1 contains a -src-ide.zip file, as its very useful.

[lang] StringUtils consumes a lot of memory ?

2006-01-25 Thread Thomas Dudziak
Hi folks, I'm currently investigating a memory leak in a OJB-using application, and it seems as if StringUtils is the culprit at least in terms of memory consumption (OJB uses StringUtils#split, #replace and #indexOfAny). The problem is as follows: upon reloading a really simple webapp in Tomcat

RE: [lang] StringUtils consumes a lot of memory ?

2006-01-25 Thread James Carman
I wonder why the StringUtils Class objects can't be garbage collected. There should really only be one instance of the StringUtils Class object after a webapp reload. The previous one should go away with the WebappClassLoader when it is discarded. Correct? That would mean that we have a memory

Re: [lang] StringUtils consumes a lot of memory ?

2006-01-25 Thread Stephen Colebourne
Thomas Dudziak wrote: Hi folks, I'm currently investigating a memory leak in a OJB-using application, and it seems as if StringUtils is the culprit at least in terms of memory consumption (OJB uses StringUtils#split, #replace and #indexOfAny). The problem is as follows: upon reloading a really

Re: [lang] StringUtils consumes a lot of memory ?

2006-01-25 Thread Thomas Dudziak
On 1/26/06, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I wonder why the StringUtils Class objects can't be garbage collected. There should really only be one instance of the StringUtils Class object after a webapp reload. The previous one should go away with the WebappClassLoader when it is

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38341] - IteratorChain skips over elements in iterator

2006-01-25 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38341. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: [lang] StringUtils consumes a lot of memory ?

2006-01-25 Thread Thomas Dudziak
On 1/26/06, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It should already be lazily created. The array should begin as 65535 nulls and only get populated as each character is requested. Nope, YourKit tells me that there are 5 StringUtils.clinit() objects still in memory totalling 1.310.760

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38064] - [collections] MonthMap

2006-01-25 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38064. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: [lang] StringUtils consumes a lot of memory ?

2006-01-25 Thread Stephen Colebourne
Thomas Dudziak wrote: On 1/26/06, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It should already be lazily created. The array should begin as 65535 nulls and only get populated as each character is requested. Nope, YourKit tells me that there are 5 StringUtils.clinit() objects still in

Re: [lang] StringUtils consumes a lot of memory ?

2006-01-25 Thread Thomas Dudziak
On 1/26/06, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Doesn't look anything wrong here... private static final String[] PADDING = new String[Character.MAX_VALUE + 1]; static { // space padding is most common, start with 64 chars PADDING[32] = ; } or in the