On Mon, 12 Nov 2001, Tal Dayan wrote:
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 22:21:25 -0800
From: Tal Dayan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Digester question
Hello,
I am new to this list. If there is a more appropriate place
On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Tal Dayan wrote:
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 18:59:30 -0800
From: Tal Dayan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [digester] using non URL'ed DTD's
Hello,
We are
On Fri, 16 Nov 2001, Warren Janssens wrote:
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 17:32:57 -0500 (EST)
From: Warren Janssens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: workflow
I was just curious how the workflow in sandbox relates
(if
On Tue, 4 Dec 2001, Aravinda Addala wrote:
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 14:54:44 -
From: Aravinda Addala [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Digester: Examples
Hi,
I am new to Digester. I have looked at the examples
On Tue, 4 Dec 2001, James Strachan wrote:
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 16:43:56 -
From: James Strachan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta Commons Developers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [digester] setting attributes text content on the
text content on the same
object...
On Tuesday, December 4, 2001, at 05:30 PM, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
On Tue, 4 Dec 2001, James Strachan wrote:
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 16:43:56 -
From: James Strachan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List commons
IllegalAccessException in CallMethodRule,
SetNextRule
On Wednesday, December 5, 2001, at 06:40 AM, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
On Tue, 4 Dec 2001, Donnie Hale wrote:
snip
Is it possible to
implement an interface with methods which have package scope though the
interface methods are public? I
if this plan is acceptable.
+1
- robert
Craig
On Thursday, December 6, 2001, at 02:04 AM, Donnie Hale wrote:
See below...
Donnie
-Original Message-
From: craigmcc@localhost [mailto:craigmcc@localhost]On Behalf Of Craig
R. McClanahan
Sent: Wednesday, December 05
On Sun, 9 Dec 2001, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2001 22:09:05 -0500
From: Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Possible addition to StringUtils
On 12/9/01
On -1 xxx -1, Morgan Delagrange wrote:
From: Morgan Delagrange [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Jakarta Commons Developers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Move logging package from Sandbox to Commons Proper
Just out of curiousity, why the sudden
On Tue, 11 Dec 2001, robert burrell donkin wrote:
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 22:46:06 +
From: robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: (Beanutils)[SUBMIT]
On Thu, 13 Dec 2001, Mika Goeckel wrote:
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 00:35:58 +0100
From: Mika Goeckel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Self configuring Objects or is it possible to change the rule
set during the
On Thu, 13 Dec 2001, robert burrell donkin wrote:
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 18:07:44 +
From: robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: selfconfiguring objects
There's been a lot of interest, both here (COMMONS-DEV), on the Struts
mailing lists, and elsewhere in the idea of a JavaBean-like thing where
the set of properties can be dynamically defined. If support for this was
integrated into the BeanUtils package in Commons, we could also make the
On 15 Dec 2001, Bryan Field-Elliot wrote:
Date: 15 Dec 2001 14:49:30 -0700
From: Bryan Field-Elliot [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Design Discussion] DynaBean - JavaBeans
On 15 Dec 2001, Bryan Field-Elliot wrote:
Date: 15 Dec 2001 15:21:05 -0700
From: Bryan Field-Elliot [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Design Discussion] DynaBean - JavaBeans
and the underlying bean
would have to know.
I think it is an excellent idea, let's get started.
Scott Sanders
Craig
-Original Message-
From: craigmcc@localhost [mailto:craigmcc@localhost] On
Behalf Of Craig R. McClanahan
Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2001 1:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, Scott Sanders wrote:
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 13:39:56 -0800
From: Scott Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [VOTE] Robert Donkin as Comitter
As you can all see,
On Thu, 20 Dec 2001, robert burrell donkin wrote:
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 22:19:33 +
From: robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: (Logging)[Proposal] A little
On 23 Dec 2001, Bryan Field-Elliot wrote:
Date: 23 Dec 2001 16:46:40 -0700
From: Bryan Field-Elliot [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: DynaBean work?
Craig et. al., has any work
Many thanks for all of the interesting and useful feedback to my original
DynaBeans design proposal circulated last week. Based on this feedback I
have made several changes (outlined below), and checked in some basic
interface definitions that conform to these requirements into the Commons
See interspersed.
On Thu, 27 Dec 2001, Rey Francois wrote:
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2001 16:45:24 +0100
From: Rey Francois [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Jakarta Commons Developers List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Design Discussion]
On Thu, 27 Dec 2001, Rey Francois wrote:
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2001 18:36:25 +0100
From: Rey Francois [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Jakarta Commons Developers List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Design Discussion] DynaBeans - Round 2
On Thu, 27 Dec 2001, Paulo Gaspar wrote:
From: Rey Francois [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
I had to crate a similar interface in a data mapper framework I developed,
however in the signature of the conversion method I included an additional
parameter for the Locale. Without it, support
Snipping to deal with a few questinos and thoughts ...
On Thu, 27 Dec 2001, Paulo Gaspar wrote:
In my experience the data type should be already in the most basic
implementation or you have not much than a Map with an indexed (int)
access.
I'm thinking that there will be two common use
On Thu, 27 Dec 2001, Scott Sanders wrote:
I assume you are a comitter on avalon? Just ask for karma to the
commons-sandbox and start building a proposal. It is that easy. Then
if it gains traction, we vote to upgrade it to commons.
Done. Paul now has commit access on
On Fri, 28 Dec 2001, Erik Hatcher wrote:
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2001 09:05:32 -0500
From: Erik Hatcher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: cvs commit:
On Fri, 28 Dec 2001, robert burrell donkin wrote:
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2001 14:37:31 +
From: robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: third patch for digester -
-Original Message Extract-
From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 25 December 2001 00:52
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Design Discussion] DynaBeans - Round 2
(...)
Proposed Next Steps (Once Design Is Agreed Upon):
(4) Implement proxy DynaClass and DynaBean
On Fri, 28 Dec 2001, Lavandowska wrote:
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2001 08:05:50 -0800 (PST)
From: Lavandowska [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: New tool - armi -
On Fri, 4 Jan 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 14:31:19 -0500 (EST)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [PATCH] - PropertyUtils - bug 5639
According
I added the appropriate CVS karma for Jeff. Welcome!
Craig
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 5 Jan 2002, robert burrell donkin wrote:
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2002 13:50:57 +
From: robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Digester] Supporting mixed
On Mon, 7 Jan 2002, Scott Sanders wrote:
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 11:20:41 -0800
From: Scott Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: cvs commit:
On Mon, 7 Jan 2002, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2002 22:43:29 -0500
From: Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Commons Validator Packaging/Content
On 8 Jan 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: 8 Jan 2002 07:41:12 -0800
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: HTTPClient - setting default request headers impl Q
What should happen if one
On Tue, 8 Jan 2002, Gerhard Froehlich wrote:
Ok, if you like them to test, then I ask for enough karma in the sandbox
area to commit the components.
Done.
Gerhard
Craig
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 8 Jan 2002, John McNally wrote:
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2002 12:56:56 -0800
From: John McNally [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: torque and my work on its connection pool.
I guess there has been some discussion
On Tue, 8 Jan 2002, David Winterfeldt wrote:
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 13:21:57 -0800 (PST)
From: David Winterfeldt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: commons-validator
I want to.
On Tue, 8 Jan 2002, Paulo Gaspar wrote:
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 23:09:51 +0100
From: Paulo Gaspar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: torque and my work on
On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Martin Cooper wrote:
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 14:26:20 -0800
From: Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PROPOSAL] Update to Commons package approval guideline
The current Commons
On Thu, 10 Jan 2002, Scott Sanders wrote:
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 10:45:00 -0800
From: Scott Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: how should log levels work? [Was Re:
On Thu, 10 Jan 2002, Paulo Gaspar wrote:
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 21:20:31 +0100
From: Paulo Gaspar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: how should log levels
quickly becomes hooked on that sort of control over your build
environment ...
Anthony
Craig
-Original Message-
List: jakarta-commons-dev
Subject: RE: cvs commit:
jakarta-commons/logging/src/java/org/apache/commo
From: Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date
On Thu, 10 Jan 2002, Scott Sanders wrote:
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 16:00:52 -0800
From: Scott Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [DIGESTER] simple xml attribute to java attribute mapping?
What is the best way
On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, Janek Bogucki wrote:
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 00:34:34 + (GMT)
From: Janek Bogucki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [DIGESTER] Two tests cases for SetTopRule
On Sat, 12 Jan 2002, John Yu wrote:
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2002 17:44:08 +0800
From: John Yu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [DynaBean] DynaBean and XML
While reading the Building Form Beans from XML Schema thread
On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, Arron Bates wrote:
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 14:26:12 +1100
From: Arron Bates [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Commons jars are busted in terms of running as-is
Done.
Craig
On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, John McNally wrote:
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 09:36:18 -0800
From: John McNally [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: commit privileges
I would like to be able to commit some code from
On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Jeff Turner wrote:
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 12:49:43 +1100
From: Jeff Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [VOTE] Dion Gillard as committer
Hi all,
I'd like to nominate Dion Gillard [EMAIL
On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Anthony Martin wrote:
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 12:48:10 -0800
From: Anthony Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: LogSource.java
In order to make this more applet
On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Randy Speh wrote:
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 06:46:53 -0800 (PST)
From: Randy Speh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: cvs commit:
On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, robert burrell donkin wrote:
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 18:21:05 +
From: robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: LogSource.java
On
On Thu, 17 Jan 2002, robert burrell donkin wrote:
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 18:28:44 +
From: robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: cvs commit:
-commons/logging/src/java/org/apache/commons/logging
On Thursday, January 17, 2002, at 06:38 PM, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jan 2002, robert burrell donkin wrote:
snip
i had intended to remove AbstractLog (since it's no longer needed) and
remove the associated test cases and so
My +1 must have gotten swallowed by my mailer ...
Craig
On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, Rey Francois wrote:
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 09:40:19 +0100
From: Rey Francois [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Jakarta Commons Developers List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, Diego Amicabile wrote:
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 13:30:18 +0100 (CET)
From: Diego Amicabile [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: getMappedProperty in PropertyUtils
Hi people,
I am using Mapped
Several of the newer jakarta-commons-sandbox packages don't follow the
build.xml conventions of the remainder of them -- not too surprising,
since these conventions are only documented in old email threads at the
moment (yes, copying them into a web page is on my TODO list unless
someone beats me
in new Sandbox Projects
On 1/22/02 2:52 PM, Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Several of the newer jakarta-commons-sandbox packages don't follow the
build.xml conventions of the remainder of them -- not too surprising,
since these conventions are only documented in old email threads
My fault ... forgot to update Gump's dependency data. Will fix in a
second.
Craig
On 24 Jan 2002, Ted Husted wrote:
Date: 24 Jan 2002 12:23:43 -
From: Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [GUMP] Build
/02 2:02 PM, Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jan 2002, Scott Sanders wrote:
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 10:38:07 -0800
From: Scott Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL
Well, it took a week but better late than never ... Thanks Janek!
Craig
On Sat, 19 Jan 2002, Janek Bogucki wrote:
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2002 00:05:15 +
From: Janek Bogucki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
We've refined the commons-logging APIs, and documented the mechanics. In
addition, I've heard from numerous people on various projects that would
like to use these APIs, but are hesitant to do so without a 1.0 release.
Therefore, I'd like to now propose that we do a 1.0 release of the
Release
Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jan 2002, Scott Sanders wrote:
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 11:27:23 -0800
From: Scott Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Logging
On Tue, 29 Jan 2002, Waldhoff, Rodney wrote:
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 14:56:39 -0600
From: Waldhoff, Rodney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Jakarta Commons Developers List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Logging] [VOTE] Commons Logging 1.0
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, dIon Gillard wrote:
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 14:18:59 +1100
From: dIon Gillard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Web site update request] - Latka
I've updated
Out of the discussions yesterday, the proposal to release
commons-logging 1.0 received a sufficient number of +1 votes to pass.
Howeer, three issues were raised that should be settled beforehand, in
order to provide future users of this package with a stable API. I'd like
to review them
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Scott Sanders wrote:
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 14:13:40 -0800
From: Scott Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Logging] [VOTE-REDUX] Commons Logging 1.0
frustrating than debugging a server
app that just disappeared.
Scott
Craig
-Original Message-
From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 2:30 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: RE: [Logging] [VOTE-REDUX] Commons
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Paulo Gaspar wrote:
Hey, I am talking about the really minimal log to a file
configuration that any logger supports and drawing the line
after that.
The any logger supports statement is why this proposal is on the
slippery slope. IMHO, the commons-logging API itself
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Viraf Bankwalla wrote:
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 14:37:36 -0800 (PST)
From: Viraf Bankwalla [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Workflow
Hi,
I noticed that there
the introduction of conditional steps, so it
uses goto for flow control -- but you can get a feel for where I've been
thinking from this.
Thanks.
- viraf
Craig
--- Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Viraf Bankwalla wrote:
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 14:37:36
On 9 Feb 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: 9 Feb 2002 19:18:28 -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: cvs commit: jakarta-commons-sandbox/simplestore/lib
jdbc2_0-stdext.jar
froehlich02/02/09
On Tue, 12 Feb 2002, Glenn Nielsen wrote:
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 10:24:52 -0600
From: Glenn Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Servlet Filters Proposal]
I didn't put
On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, Dirk Storck wrote:
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 09:03:58 +0100
From: Dirk Storck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Jakarta Commons Developers List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: AW: [BeanUtils]
On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, Oleg V Alexeev wrote:
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 11:31:37 +0300
From: Oleg V Alexeev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Oleg V Alexeev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Jakarta Commons Developers List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, Laine Donlan wrote:
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 17:49:11 -0500
From: Laine Donlan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta Commons DevList (E-mail) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Workflow] - Couple of questions
First off -
On Thu, 14 Feb 2002, Paulo Gaspar wrote:
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 03:11:07 +0100
From: Paulo Gaspar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: cvs
On 14 Feb 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: 14 Feb 2002 21:09:19 -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: cvs commit:
jakarta-commons/logging/src/java/org/apache/commons/logging
LogFactory.java
On Thu, 14 Feb 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 20:00:00 -0800 (PST)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [logging] Default log
The current default is NoOp.
On Fri, 15 Feb 2002, Scott Sanders wrote:
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 09:53:10 -0800
From: Scott Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: cvs
On Mon, 18 Feb 2002, Morgan Delagrange wrote:
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 14:45:30 -0600
From: Morgan Delagrange [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Morgan Delagrange [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta Commons Developers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
On Tue, 19 Feb 2002, Donie Kelly wrote:
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 15:39:26 -
From: Donie Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Jakarta Commons Developers List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [pool] Examples ?
Hi all
Are there any
on the prerelease
version.
Craig
-Original Message-
From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 7:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [VOTE] Logging 1.0 Release (again)
OK, the round of discussion last time around has triggered
On Wed, 20 Feb 2002, dIon Gillard wrote:
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 17:39:07 +1100
From: dIon Gillard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Proposal: New Committer - Marc Saegesser
I'd
On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, Michael A. Smith wrote:
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 11:18:21 -0600 (CST)
From: Michael A. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Commons Util 1.0 release
On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, Lavandowska wrote:
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 11:33:38 -0800 (PST)
From: Lavandowska [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: HTTP Headers [was
+1 to both.
Craig
On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote:
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 18:37:24 -0800
From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [VOTE] New committers:
There is a part of this that is parser-related and part that is Digester
related. See intermixed responses below.
On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, Keith Chew wrote:
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 18:07:18 +1300
From: Keith Chew [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
On Mon, 25 Feb 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 20:31:50 -0800 (PST)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [logging] minor patch applied for
On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, James Strachan wrote:
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 04:47:57 -
From: James Strachan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta Commons Developers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [digester] lowering logging level of a couple of
On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, Juozas Baliuka wrote:
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 19:12:36 +0100
From: Juozas Baliuka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: commons dbcp or
On Sun, 10 Mar 2002, robert burrell donkin wrote:
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 16:26:10 +
From: robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
On 11 Mar 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Index: build.xml
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/jakarta-commons/digester/build.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.20
retrieving revision 1.21
diff -u -r1.20 -r1.21
--- build.xml
I'd like to suggest a convention for nwe Bugzilla bug reports related to
Commons packages that has worked well for many other Jakarta projects --
make the initial owner of all bugs the commons-dev mailing list. This
causes all new bug reports (and updates to them) to get reflected to the
but lots of error messages are printed out.
That's what I get for looking at the log output instead of BUILD
SUCCESSFUL :-). I'll go ahead and upt it back in.
- robert
Craig
On Monday, March 11, 2002, at 05:06 AM, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
On 11 Mar 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
On 12 Mar 2002, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
Date: 12 Mar 2002 21:58:37 -0500
From: Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Please Release commons logging --
So a little bird told me that Commons logging
On Thu, 14 Mar 2002, Jason R Lee wrote:
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 06:34:07 -0800
From: Jason R Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [dbcp] Works with JNDI, but some remarks...
On Fri, 15 Mar 2002, Lev Assinovsky wrote:
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 00:02:50 +0300
From: Lev Assinovsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [dbcp] Works with JNDI, but some
On Sun, 17 Mar 2002, Lev Assinovsky wrote:
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2002 20:39:12 +0300
From: Lev Assinovsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [dbcp] Works with JNDI, but some
1 - 100 of 425 matches
Mail list logo
