Probably worth checking if it's performant or not first :)
I just got my laptop back after a couple of weeks on a spare, so ready
to get JProfiler up and running for testing. Maybe a good time to
check YourKit out too.
Hen
On 5/22/06, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, I see.
Whatever method
urs hardegger wrote:
netcetera suggests the following changes to commons csv:
1) CSVPartser.java:
StringBuffer.append(StringBuffer) is no supported in JDK 1.3.
It would be a pitty to have an incompatibility because
of this issue. In case this is performance critical,
It is supported in jdk1.3.. Just cast the stringbuffer passed in to
an object, so like
StringBuffer.append((Object) StringBuffer)). Much more efficient than
an if...
Surely a StringBuffer is already an Object?
Or am I missing something here?
StringBuffer has a new method in Java 1.4 to
On 22/05/06, Nicolas De Loof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is supported in jdk1.3.. Just cast the stringbuffer passed in to
an object, so like
StringBuffer.append((Object) StringBuffer)). Much more efficient than
an if...
Surely a StringBuffer is already an Object?
Or am I missing
Nicolas De Loof wrote:
It is supported in jdk1.3.. Just cast the stringbuffer passed in to
an object, so like
StringBuffer.append((Object) StringBuffer)). Much more efficient than
an if...
Surely a StringBuffer is already an Object?
Or am I missing something here?
StringBuffer has a
compiled on a JDK 1.4, sb1.append(sb2) will not work on java 1.3 JRE :
it requires append(StringBuffer).
compiled on a JDK 1.3, it is equivalent to a toString() call as
append(Object) method is used by compiler. It will work on all JRE but
will be non-optimal on JDK 1.4
Only two versions
That just works when compiling on jdk1.3 and will not work on jdk1.3 when
compiled on jdk1.4
To prevent this, you specifically have to cast it to object to say use the append which takes an
object or as Nicolas suggested a toString(), but the last one is not my favorite solution..
Mvgr,
OK, I see.
Whatever method is chosen, it's worth documenting the reasons for the
strange coding...
If a release is being built to support 1.3 and above, it might be
worth using the 1.3 compiler - or at least using the 1.3 jars.
S.
On 22/05/06, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That
Any chance you could submit these in Jira?
http://issues.apache.org/jira to the Commons Sandbox project.
Makes it easier to manage and not have things get lost; and a better
public history for showing active contributors.
Hen
On 5/17/06, urs hardegger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
netcetera
