On Tue, 2005-01-18 at 08:40 +0100, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
I did some digging in the mail-archives and found the thread I was
talking about earlier. It can be found here:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]by=threadfrom=666491
Note that eyebrowse sorts the e-mails
On 18 Jan 2005, at 08:53, Simon Kitching wrote:
snip
Well, I think I'll raise a bugzilla entry with this info, as a reminder
to think about this further. But for the moment, I'm inclined to leave
digester as it is, until Robert Donkin reappears and lets us know why
this was added in the first
I'm getting an error when building the Digester Javadoc locally with Java
1.5 on XP Pro (SP2):
javadoc:
[javadoc] Generating Javadoc
[javadoc] Javadoc execution
[javadoc] javadoc: error - Illegal package name: IS BASIS,WITHOUT
WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or
Wendy Smoak wrote:
I'm getting an error when building the Digester Javadoc locally with
Java 1.5 on XP Pro (SP2):
javadoc:
[javadoc] Generating Javadoc
[javadoc] Javadoc execution
[javadoc] javadoc: error - Illegal package name: IS BASIS,WITHOUT
WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND,
On Mon, 2005-01-17 at 21:55 +0100, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Wendy Smoak wrote:
I'm getting an error when building the Digester Javadoc locally with
Java 1.5 on XP Pro (SP2):
javadoc:
[javadoc] Generating Javadoc
[javadoc] Javadoc execution
[javadoc] javadoc: error - Illegal
From: simon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It does seem
weird that this doesn't work on Windows, as the xml spec is *very* clear
about the fact that xml attributes can be quoted using '...' or ...,
so having a simple testcase that shows the problem would reassure me
that the problem really is what we think it
On Mon, 2005-01-17 at 19:06 -0700, Wendy Smoak wrote:
From: simon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It does seem
weird that this doesn't work on Windows, as the xml spec is *very* clear
about the fact that xml attributes can be quoted using '...' or ...,
so having a simple testcase that shows the problem
I did some digging in the mail-archives and found the thread I was
talking about earlier. It can be found here:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]by=threadfrom=666491
Note that eyebrowse sorts the e-mails with newest-first, so start
reading from the bottom up...
Let
