Re: [NET] GUMP Build is broken, well maybe not...

2002-10-07 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Mon, 7 Oct 2002, Jeff Brekke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It looks like, in the init target, that build.sysclasspath=only. Correct. Where are the dependant jars when gump builds a project ( oro and junit in this case )? On the sysclasspath? Yes. Can you test the gump build of commons-net

Re: [NET] GUMP Build is broken, well maybe not...

2002-10-07 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 07 Oct 2002, Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Will be back in a few minutes ... Tests compile fine but fail (I think I know why) ... Stefan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [NET] GUMP Build is broken, well maybe not...

2002-10-07 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 07 Oct 2002, Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 07 Oct 2002, Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Will be back in a few minutes ... Tests compile fine but fail (I think I know why) ... GUMP builds of commons-net now pass, even though some tests fail. I'm not sure whether

RE: [NET] GUMP Build is broken, well maybe not...

2002-10-07 Thread Brekke, Jeff
] http://www.qg.com -Original Message- From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 9:50 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [NET] GUMP Build is broken, well maybe not... On 07 Oct 2002, Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 07

Re: [NET] GUMP Build is broken, well maybe not...

2002-10-07 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Mon, 7 Oct 2002, Jeff Brekke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am running rh8.0 and jdk1.4. rh7.3 and Sun's jdk1.3.1_03 Stefan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]