rdonkin 2004/01/10 07:43:06
Modified:digester build.properties.sample project.properties
project.xml
Log:
Modified maven build to add optional support for ssh-agents. Committers who wish to
use ssh-agents need to set maven.username and digester.cvs
rdonkin 2003/10/18 06:40:46
Modified:digester build.properties.sample build.xml
Log:
Patched build script so that the logging output (which often confused new
developers) can be easily supressed. Patch submitted by Simon Kitching.
Revision ChangesPath
1.6 +6 -0
-Original Message-
From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 12:36 PM
...
commons-collections.jar=${commons-collections.home}/commons-co
llections.jar
commons-logging.home=../logging/dist
On Thu, 21 Mar 2002, Immanuel, Gidado-Yisa wrote:
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 13:21:34 -0500
From: Immanuel, Gidado-Yisa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Jakarta Commons Developers List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: property naming (Re: cvs
On Thu, 2002-03-21 at 13:55, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
As long as the Ant property names themselves do not include the version
numbers, the scheme would accomodate filenames that do. But, for the
defaults (i.e. in build.properties.sample) the unversioned version of the
names should be
On 21 Mar 2002, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Date: 21 Mar 2002 14:01:13 -0500
From: Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: property naming (Re: cvs commit:
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Rall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 12:15 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: property naming (Re: cvs commit: jakarta-commons/digester
build.properties.sample)
Jeff Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
So, the proposal would be to change this to the following:
commons-collections.jar=${lib.repo}/commons-collections.jar
commons-logging.jar=${lib.repo}/commons-logging.jar
junit.jar=${lib.repo}/junit.jar
right? You would rely on the user to define their own
lib.repo property
On Thu, 21 Mar 2002, Steve Downey wrote:
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 16:12:03 -0500
From: Steve Downey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Jakarta Commons Developers List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: property naming (Re: cvs commit:
Jeff Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes. Practice has shown me that it works extremely well. In fact,
it's a time honored tradition, with the historical precedent dating
back the beginnings of Unix. See /lib, /usr/lib, and /usr/local/lib
on your favorite Unix or Linux box. Let's learn
Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm likewise ok with switching the build.xml and build.properties.sample
defaults in Commons to ${lib.repo} style, if that's what people want --
just don't mess up my ability to override the locations of each individual
JAR file :-).
I wouldn't
Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
both are equally valid, but consistency within a particular
philosophy is even more important than choosing one or the other.
I don't agree. As I mentioned in my message in response to Jeff, and
as you say above, build files following the Struts
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 09:14:53AM -0800, Daniel Rall wrote:
Jeff Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 07:49:29PM -0800, Daniel Rall wrote:
Why not use lib.repo instead of root? Many other projects are already
using this variable to point to the location where Java
Why not use lib.repo instead of root? Many other projects are already
using this variable to point to the location where Java libraries are
rooted.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
jefft 02/03/18 17:30:59
Modified:digester build.properties.sample
Log:
More properties
On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 07:49:29PM -0800, Daniel Rall wrote:
Why not use lib.repo instead of root? Many other projects are already
using this variable to point to the location where Java libraries are
rooted.
By library repository, do you mean a directory full of random jars,
copied or
On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 08:41:22PM -0800, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
On Tue, 19 Mar 2002, Jeff Turner wrote:
On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 07:49:29PM -0800, Daniel Rall wrote:
Why not use lib.repo instead of root? Many other projects are already
using this variable to point to the location
PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 8:59 PM
Subject: Re: property naming (Re: cvs commit: jakarta-commons/digester
build.properties.sample)
On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 08:41:22PM -0800, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
On Tue, 19 Mar 2002, Jeff
jefft 02/02/26 16:50:33
Modified:digester build.properties.sample
Log:
Parametrize Commons projects' home directories, and default to
../project/dist, as the only portable assumption likely to be correct (for
CVS users)
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +11 -4
18 matches
Mail list logo
