Doh.. David's email was sent just after I left for 5 weeks holiday.
Sorry..
Anyway, I'm still keen to house the DoctypeChanger code here at
xml-commons. Judging by mailing list posts, DOCTYPE declarations seem
quite a problematic area of XML interoperability, and the DoctypeChanger
offers a clean,
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 08:30:42AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> (Apologies if this is a dup, mailer problems abound this week)
> ---- you Jeff Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> [jt]>> What needs to change? Do you see something specific? This
> paragraph from
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 07:37:14PM +1100, David Crossley wrote:
> Jeff continued:
> > Anyone in favour of officially making xml-commons' charter closer to
> > jakarta-commons?
>
> What needs to change? Do you see something specific?
This paragraph from xml-commons/README.html:
New modules gene
Wohoo..
On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 12:57:11PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I've gone ahead and 'bent' the new code rule for xml-commons
Anyone in favour of officially making xml-commons' charter closer to
jakarta-commons? I have a utility[1] I think would complement Norman
Walsh's Catalog code.
