Re: Wire logging problem...

2003-10-06 Thread David Brady
Yup - found it / fixed it. I had transcribed log4j.category to log4j.logger. That was it. Thanks much. Cheers, David From: "David Brady" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Commons HttpClient Project" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: W

Re: Wire logging problem...

2003-10-06 Thread David Brady
David, You might try setting the logging level for the "Logger" called "httpclient.wire". In other words, add this: log4j.category.httpclient.wire= Alas, I already had it in my log4j.properties file from my experiments over the weekend. Didn't impact wire logging levels at all: log4j.

Re: Wire logging problem...

2003-10-06 Thread Eric Johnson
David, You might try setting the logging level for the "Logger" called "httpclient.wire". In other words, add this: log4j.category.httpclient.wire= with the debug level of your choice. If you look carefully at the logging.html page, you can dig this tidbit out from this line: "System.set

Wire logging problem...

2003-10-06 Thread David Brady
I use Log4j for our current project - no problems with it. I've added to our log4j.properties file: log4j.category.org.apache=INFO This represses all of the httpclient debug messages (great!), but it doesn't impact the "wire" debug messages. Am I missing something? I've checked the logging do