DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22654] - [Maven] Migrate checkstyle.properties to XML

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: IBMJSSE implementation issue

Oleg, Thank you for your additional research, if I enable the log I have : DEBUG org.apache.commons.httpclient.HttpClient - Java version: 1.3.1 DEBUG org.apache.commons.httpclient.HttpClient - Java vendor: IBM Corporation DEBUG org.apache.commons.httpclient.HttpClient - Java class path: C:\Lau

RE: IBMJSSE implementation issue

Laurent, I did some additional tests. With the java.net.Socket.getSendBufferSize method call commented out, HttpClient works with IBMJSSE 1.0 without a hitch. However, I think you should try to get IBM to look at the problem. To me this clearly looks like a bug in their implementation of JSSE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22654] - [Maven] Migrate checkstyle.properties to XML

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Is there still anything that blocks 2.0RC2 release?

Is there still anything that blocks 2.0RC2 release? Oleg - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Is there still anything that blocks 2.0RC2 release?

Not that I know of. Mike On Tuesday, October 7, 2003, at 04:33 AM, Kalnichevski, Oleg wrote: Is there still anything that blocks 2.0RC2 release? Oleg - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail

RE: Is there still anything that blocks 2.0RC2 release?

Mike, What is the outcome of this one? Is there anything we may need to do regarding automatic connection release in abnormal situations http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=10644270561&r=1&w=2 Oleg -Original Message- From: Michael Becke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October

Re: delete cookies from HttpState

Yue, That can be done, of course. Feel free to file a feature request in the bugzilla. Oleg On Mon, 2003-10-06 at 19:43, Yue Luo wrote: > Hi, >I wonder if in the next release a method like deleteAllCookies() > could be added to HttpState. I am developing a driver for a web > benchmark and

Re: Is there still anything that blocks 2.0RC2 release?

Yes, a final decision still needs to be made on that one. Do you have any thoughts? Mike Kalnichevski, Oleg wrote: Mike, What is the outcome of this one? Is there anything we may need to do regarding automatic connection release in abnormal situations http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=106442705

Re: Is there still anything that blocks 2.0RC2 release?

Mike, Are there any reasons for NOT automatically releasing connection? I can't think of any. We should still require HttpMethod#releaseConnection() to be called explicitly regardless if there was an exception or not, but in those cases where we can be sure that the connection is not needed anymore

Re: Is there still anything that blocks 2.0RC2 release?

Oleg, Generally speaking I agree. I wanted to look at it more carefully though to verify that a method that throws an exception has no case for holding on to the connection. If you cannot think of any reason, then that's good enough for me. Mike Oleg Kalnichevski wrote: Mike, Are there any

Re: Is there still anything that blocks 2.0RC2 release?

> Generally speaking I agree. I wanted to look at it more carefully > though to verify that a method that throws an exception has no case for > holding on to the connection. If you cannot think of any reason, then > that's good enough for me. Mike, You should not put too much faith into it.

Re: Is there still anything that blocks 2.0RC2 release?

Oleg, Okay, I'll take a look at this when I get a chance. Let's go ahead and proceed with a rc2 without this change. If I can get to it in time we can include it, if not we won't. Mike Oleg Kalnichevski wrote: Generally speaking I agree. I wanted to look at it more carefully though to ver

[VOTE] 2.0 RC2 release

I propose that we mark the latest code in CVS HTTPCLIENT_2_0_BRANCH as RC2 and proceed with a release. Please vote as follows: -- Vote: HttpClient 2.0 RC2 release [ ] +1 I am in favor of the release, and will help supp

Re: [VOTE] 2.0 RC2 release

+1 On Tuesday, October 7, 2003, at 07:16 PM, Michael Becke wrote: I propose that we mark the latest code in CVS HTTPCLIENT_2_0_BRANCH as RC2 and proceed with a release. Please vote as follows: --- --- Vote: HttpClient 2.0

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23663] New: - Connections are not release when a recoverable exception occurs.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23663] - Connections are not release when a recoverable exception occurs.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23663] - Connections are not release when a recoverable exception occurs.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [VOTE] 2.0 RC2 release

+1 On Tue, 2003-10-07 at 23:16, Michael Becke wrote: > I propose that we mark the latest code in CVS HTTPCLIENT_2_0_BRANCH as > RC2 and proceed with a release. Please vote as follows: > > > -- > Vote: HttpClient 2.0