RE: [PATCH] PostMethod PutMethod revision (take 2)

2003-01-31 Thread Kalnichevski, Oleg
into possibility of simplifying request buffering as well Stay tuned. Good thing come to those who wait Oleg -Original Message- From: Jeffrey Dever [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Freitag, 31. Januar 2003 16:54 To: Commons HttpClient Project Subject: Re: [PATCH] PostMethod PutMethod

RE: [PATCH] PostMethod PutMethod revision (take 2)

2003-01-31 Thread Kalnichevski, Oleg
HttpClient Project Subject: RE: [PATCH] PostMethod PutMethod revision (take 2) Jandalf Got ya. I have just managed to reproduce the behaviour of buggy servers that ignore Expect: 100-continue header and discovered BIG FAT NASTY bugs in my code. So, I am currently busy busting those bugs. I'll

Re: [PATCH] PostMethod PutMethod revision (take 2)

2003-01-30 Thread Michael Becke
7) About Mikes idea for having two different classes for stream posting and parameters posting. I don't really like what that does to the public interface. Its already fat when it comes to parameters, and conceptually it is just a POST method. Here is another idea. Using streams is the