On 21 Oct 2010, at 20:09, geni wrote:
On 21 October 2010 14:04, Magnus Manske magnusman...@googlemail.com wrote:
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101020/04044411496/english-heritage-organization-claiming-it-holds-effective-copyright-on-any-and-all-photos-of-stonehenge.shtml
No. Apart from
On 23 October 2010 11:07, Michael Peel em...@mikepeel.net wrote:
Basically, they only have a problem with people that take commercial
photographs from their property. Which is an interesting question: taking
photographs for Wikipedia means that they are available for commercial use,
so
On 23 October 2010 11:07, Michael Peel em...@mikepeel.net wrote:
They've clarified their position:
http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/about/news/photography-and-stonehenge/
Basically, they only have a problem with people that take commercial
photographs from their property. Which is an
On 21 October 2010 14:04, Magnus Manske magnusman...@googlemail.com wrote:
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101020/04044411496/english-heritage-organization-claiming-it-holds-effective-copyright-on-any-and-all-photos-of-stonehenge.shtml
No. Apart from anything else the stones in the current
