Re: [Commons-l] UK rights - headsup

2010-03-19 Thread Michael Peel
I don't understand this - why would this have any effect on PD works? It only affects those that are in copyright but the author is not known, surely? Mike On 19 Mar 2010, at 01:32, Gnangarra wrote: What we could have is images that were once PD becoming copyright violations, minor

[Commons-l] UK rights - headsup

2010-03-18 Thread Gnangarra
http://www.bjp-online.com/public/showPage.html?page=873803 This may become or present both benefits and problems to Commons in relation to copyright on photographs from the UK. Be nice if some UK people or legal people monitor and get an idea of possible issues in relation to permissions as this

Re: [Commons-l] UK rights - headsup

2010-03-18 Thread Caroline Ford
If anything we may gain from the orphan works clause. The BJP is running a campaign against this as it thinks that photos without metatags will be stolen. Sent from a mobile device. On 18 Mar 2010, at 14:34, Gnangarra gnanga...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: [Commons-l] UK rights - headsup

2010-03-18 Thread Andre Engels
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 4:51 PM, Caroline Ford caroline.ford.w...@googlemail.com wrote: If anything we may gain from the orphan works clause. The BJP is running a campaign against this as it thinks that photos without metatags will be stolen. I don't think there will be much gain for Commons -

Re: [Commons-l] UK rights - headsup

2010-03-18 Thread Gnangarra
What we could have is images that were once PD becoming copyright violations, minor issue but we'd have to delete them The other is under due dilligence we could have request for checkuser information to identify the IP of the uploader so that a person(corporate) wanting to take ownership of a