Hi Mehta,
I agree with Tahir's recommendation.
If you're writing an application, then just use log4j or
java.util.logging, or whatever you prefer. It's simpler, faster, and
less confusing to just call the specific logging API directly.
If you're writing a library that will be used in some other
Hi Mehta,
I hope you have done a thorough comparison of commons logging wrapper versus
directly using a logging api like log4j, jdk1.4 logging etc. Recently there
was a discussion on this list on merits/demerits of using commons logging
which is essentially a wrapper instead of using a logging
On Wed, 2006-05-03 at 03:04 -0700, Meera Mehta wrote:
Hi,
I am new to commons logging, we are using commons
logging in our next project.
I want to know why Log implementations(Wrappers say
Log4JLogger,Jdk14Logger) implements Serializable
please let me kow.
so that people who want
Thanks Tahir,
Surely i will go threw that discussion.
Thank you very much for quick reply.
Mehta
--- Tahir Akhtar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Mehta,
I hope you have done a thorough comparison of
commons logging wrapper versus
directly using a logging api like log4j, jdk1.4
logging etc.
Thanks Robert,
Its really very useful link for me, i got answer
thanks a lot.
Mehta
--- robert burrell donkin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2006-05-03 at 03:04 -0700, Meera Mehta
wrote:
Hi,
I am new to commons logging, we are using commons
logging in our next project.
I
