Hi!
I still have the problem of setting up the javaflow byte code
enhancement.
After the task did not work (as described within my previous email):
---
javaflow srcdir=build/classes destdir=build/classes
include name=**/*.class /
/javaflow
--
Returns the error message:
The javaflow type
Another question for the javaflow ant task:
The homepage says that the attribute destdir is required.
However, when I use it, I get the following error message:
---
snip/
What am I doing wrong?
Have a look yourself:
I have recently been diagnosing a performance issue with a network
service we are starting via commons launcher.
The problem is that the service starts excessively consuming CPU cycles
to the point at having near 100% utilisation (as shown by top).
At first I thought it was in some of our code,
Hi!
Well, see subject: why doesn't Bag have a get() method? Doesn't make sense,
does it?
Timo
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Get what? What method signature are you expecting? What is your use case?
Stephen
- Original Message
From: Timo Nentwig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta Commons Users List commons-user@jakarta.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, 13 July, 2006 2:39:59 PM
Subject: Why doesn't Bag have a get() method?
snicker
--- Nentwig, Timo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stephen Colebourne wrote:
Get what? What method signature are you expecting?
What is your use case?
Well, get what I did add(). Get that what contains()
is checking for. Get what getCount() is counting.
- Original Message
Why don't you write Sun and ask them to add a get() method to the
java.util.Set interface too?
-Original Message-
From: Nentwig, Timo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 4:10 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Users List
Subject: Re: [collections] Re: Why doesn't Bag have a get()
On Sat, 2006-07-08 at 16:27 +0200, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
There are a lot of hand made poms in the repo so i don't see that as a
problem.
AFAIK the difference between api and implementation is the
dependencies section, so it's just a matter of copying it and strip
all unneded deps (all of
Nentwig, Timo wrote:
Stephen Colebourne wrote:
Get what? What method signature are you expecting? What is your use case?
Well, get what I did add(). Get that what contains() is checking for.
Get what getCount() is counting.
I believe that you want the method:
public Object get(Object);
robert burrell donkin wrote:
On Sat, 2006-07-08 at 16:27 +0200, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
There are a lot of hand made poms in the repo so i don't see that as a problem.
AFAIK the difference between api and implementation is the
dependencies section, so it's just a matter of copying it and strip
Simon Kitching wrote:
On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 23:58 +0200, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
On Sat, 2006-07-08 at 16:27 +0200, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
There are a lot of hand made poms in the repo so i don't see that as a problem.
AFAIK the difference between api and
11 matches
Mail list logo
