Thanks for that, I've added a new test (based on yours) and fixed
existing ones. It turns out that GroupImpl was only validating options
that are present and skipping those that were missing. I've fixed
this in cvs but no binary is available yet.
ok thanks, I've updated my local checkout now
a number of things I think.
thanks,
Andrew
-Original Message-
From: Rob Oxspring [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 24 September 2004 12:15
To: Andrew Ferguson; Jakarta Commons Users List
Subject: Re: [cli] commons cli version 2.0?
Hi,
(cc to commons-user since this may be useful to others
hi,
My early versions of the CLI2 model included several exceptions
covering the various situations but we merged them all into one feeling
that people
were unlikely to be interested in the differences. I assume you want
to know, for a given exception, whether to give tool level help or
sorry the attachment seems to have failed - here is the plain text:
package org.apache.commons.cli2.application;
import java.io.*;
import javax.swing.*;
import junit.framework.TestCase;
import org.apache.commons.cli2.*;
import org.apache.commons.cli2.Group;
import
this is also my plan - am hoping that ikvm and the ClassPath project
mature enough to let me run my current java application on the .NET CLR
without changes.
I also like quite a lot of the changes they made from java for C# - it
seems they have made a few more concessions to C++ programmers, and
ikvm might be able to compile the jar directly for .NET?
http://weblog.ikvm.net/
-Original Message-
From: Bart Read [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 August 2004 11:22
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: C# implementation of Jakarta-Commons
Dear All,
I've been a user of the Commons
, any pure java jar which doesn't use too recent API (ie the
Classpath open-source project supports all the used API) will compile ?
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Ferguson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 August 2004 13:41
To: Jakarta Commons Users List
Subject: RE: C# implementation
this also seems to happen with the current cvs image - I'm not sure what
the CLI 2.0 classes are though - is anyone still working on the pre-2.0
classes?
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Ferguson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 15 July 2004 18:40
To: Jakarta Commons Users List
Subject
hi,
this could be me misunderstanding the posix standard but this link
http://java.sun.com/docs/books/tutorial/essential/attributes/_posix.html
says
Options that do not require arguments can be grouped after a
hyphen, so, for example, -lst is equivalent to -t -l -s.
but
