Re: [Logging] Facade

2003-06-04 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Adam Jack wrote: Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 06:42:58 -0600 From: Adam Jack [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Logging] Facade I have a wrapper around my commons logging calls, as

RE: [Logging] Facade

2003-06-04 Thread Adam Jack
The existing Log implementation classes in c-l are already facades, so they go to some effort to make available the name of the class that called them. However, this support is hard coded -- for example, see the log(Level,String,Throwable) method in

RE: [Logging] Facade

2003-06-04 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
] Subject: RE: [Logging] Facade The existing Log implementation classes in c-l are already facades, so they go to some effort to make available the name of the class that called them. However, this support is hard coded -- for example, see the log(Level,String,Throwable

RE: [Logging] Facade

2003-06-04 Thread Adam Jack
(2) I need to fail safe if logging is not in the environment (so can't put those classes into my code). You mean if the C-L classes are not in your code? (C-L already defaults to SimpleLog writing to System.out if neither JDK 1.4 or Log4J 1.2 can be

RE: [Logging] Facade

2003-06-04 Thread Adam Jack
P.S. C-L needs an Eclipse Plug-in Log driver and an Ant Log driver ... otherwise folks (like me) have to attempt to write C-L wrappers to try to make them. ;-) regards Adam - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For