Re: [Digester] addFactoryCreate problem (I think)

2007-07-17 Thread simon
Hi Robert, Sorry you didn't get any feedback from the list. When I saw it involved hashmaps of hashmaps I decided I'd punt and let someone else figure it out. I guess everyone else did too :-). Actually, having re-read your email several times now I'm still not clear what datastructure you

Re: [Digester] addFactoryCreate problem (I think)

2007-07-17 Thread Robert Watkins
Thanks, Simon, for taking the time to respond even though this posting is no longer fresh. For the sake of completeness, the data structure I want (and now have) is indeed a HashMap of HashMaps: HashMapString, HashMapString, String Having written the code myself, this of course does not seem

Re: [Digester] addFactoryCreate problem (I think)

2007-06-29 Thread Robert Watkins
In the final analysis, I suspect the problem had to do with the order and way in which Digester is pushing and popping to/from the stack, and not with ObjectCreationFactory. The solution I eventually came up with (my this is a quiet list!) was a refactoring of my approach, using a single Rule at

Re: [Digester] addFactoryCreate problem (I think)

2007-06-28 Thread Robert Watkins
Given the lack of response, I fear it may be due to the improper subject line, lacking the [Digester] string. I've thus added it in hopes that it will garner a response (and at the risk of being considered pushy). -- RW - To

Re: [Digester] addFactoryCreate problem (I think)

2007-06-28 Thread Rahul Akolkar
Can you please include the original question? Not that it will guarantee an answer, but it may be easier on anyone looking at this. -Rahul On 6/28/07, Robert Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Given the lack of response, I fear it may be due to the improper subject line, lacking the [Digester]

Re: [Digester] addFactoryCreate problem (I think)

2007-06-28 Thread Robert Watkins
Sorry, thought it would remain part of the original thread. Here goes: original question This one's been dogging me for hours, and as I've been unable to find an answer on the web, it's to the community I go! A relevant XML fragment is as follows: types fieldtype