On 27/1/03 2:50 am, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just did some cleanup on the Wiki (deleted all pages marked for deletion).
Is there a need for a wiki@ or wikiadmin@ mailing list, or should admin
activity be posted to infrastructure? Or doesn't anyone care? ;-) The
flip side
In my book Andy (Oliver, not Clark) is the master of Wiki...
Andy gave myself and Ben Hyde admin access. From what Andy is saying, his
plan is to give that to anyone (within reason) who asks. I don't
particularly have a care, other than that people ought to know that such
things as deleting
Costin,
Consensus or at least a majority :-)
I believe he was using the common dictionary definition, not refering to
unanimity.
[agregating blogs ( or subsets ) from the apache community]
is a very different and IMO more important issue.
Putting this information togheter and making it
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 01:25:47AM -0500, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
...
A project site, such as James or Jakarta, could integrate their SubWiki with
the rest of their SVN-backed web content. I am expecting that Greg and the
rest of the Subversion folks will be ensuring that unchanged DAV content,
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Andy gave ... and Ben Hyde admin access.
Wires got crossed someplace and that didn't come to closure. It's been
a while but it maybe that it stumbled at the get account on nagoya
step? No big deal.
I continue to believe that the wiki should be per PMC. Infrastructure
