Re: ML Config (Re: Press PR)

2003-10-26 Thread Tetsuya Kitahata
On Sun, 26 Oct 2003 23:57:19 +0100 "Sander Striker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The owners of those lists (the Incubator and WS PMCs respectively) can > > request a change to [EMAIL PROTECTED] An alternative would be for them to > > submit a bug report against the infrastructure project via

RE: ML Config (Re: Press PR)

2003-10-26 Thread Sander Striker
> From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2003 11:53 PM > > At least, projects@incubator.apache.org and > > jaxme-dev@ws.apache.org have wrong configurations. > > > Please fix and notify it of the participants of > > these mailing lists after that. > > The own

RE: Press PR (was Re: The board is not responsible!)

2003-10-26 Thread Antonio Gallardo
Noel J. Bergman dijo: >> Is there any reason we don't run something like Spam Assassin > > We do have anti-spam filters. The problem is balancing false positives > against spam. The bias has been against false positives. I've no doubt > that more can, and will, be done in the future. This is a

RE: ML Config (Re: Press PR)

2003-10-26 Thread Noel J. Bergman
> At least, projects@incubator.apache.org and > jaxme-dev@ws.apache.org have wrong configurations. > Please fix and notify it of the participants of > these mailing lists after that. The owners of those lists (the Incubator and WS PMCs respectively) can request a change to [EMAIL PROTECTED] An

RE: Press PR (was Re: The board is not responsible!)

2003-10-26 Thread Noel J. Bergman
> > Some lists were setup wrong. AFAIK, none of the lists should accept mail > > from non-subscribers without moderation. > Although there are some lists where it might be nice. repository@ was setup that way. There was no advertisement of its existence, yet it was receiving spam. I don't thin