Tetsuya,
> Ceremony. I suspect it that even such a nice community has to
> be baptized once. (one day or less)
> Legitimatization, in order to keep *consistency* in a big
> and social community. To make it orthodox.
No, Incubation has nothing to do with pomp and circumstance.
--- Noel
On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 16:13:31 -0500
Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
> Does it seem sensible to take an already successful ASL licensed,
> community developed piece of software by an already successful open
> source developer and force it into a somewhat beta status by making it
> go through the incubator "
> Unrelated to whether or not we would use it, I think that blojsom could be a
> very nice ASF project. From what I have seen of it, I'd support its entry
> to the Incubator.
>
> --- Noel
Hahaha...Suffer the incubator! *evil laugh*
Does it seem sensible to take an already successful ASL licens
On 8 Jan 2004, at 19:38, Ted Leung wrote:
Next someone will insist that this has to go through the incubator.
LOL
--
Stefano.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 8 Jan 2004 15:40:29 -0500
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> At least two projects, WS (http://ws.apache.org/blog/) and POI
> (http://nagoya.apache.org/poi/news/), already have project blogs, although
> using different technologies.
Probably you can count this in, too:
http://javatapestry.blogspot.
> It is possible that he'd be willing to [bring blojsom] to the incubator.
> It already has a very active community. Its probably bordering on
> becoming a "standard" just because Roller tends to take Blojsom's code.
Unrelated to whether or not we would use it, I think that blojsom could be a
ver
