-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brian Behlendorf writes:
> On Wed, 13 Oct 2004, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> > On Wednesday 13 October 2004 16:44, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
> >
> >> In the end, the majority of the 99% must adjust to the 1% of idiots.
> >
> > Hmmm At a 2 magnitude
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Wednesday 13 October 2004 16:44, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
In the end, the majority of the 99% must adjust to the 1% of idiots.
Hmmm At a 2 magnitude superiority in manpower, the majority is unable to
keep them in check, and weed them out? Is th
Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> Question; Should Open Source be Open Participation?
>
> I am sure that the upper-tier of ASF would shiver at the thought that
> hordes
> of people can gain direct access to the repositories. They/we will
> dust of
> the same arguments of why W
The correct mailing list would be [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For a list of lists, see http://apache.org/foundation/mailinglists.html and
cvs://committers/docs/resources.txt
Quoting Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> Not sure if this is the correct mailing list for these kind of issues but
>
Hi everyone,
This is a semi-cross community technical issue, regarding the change of the
org.w3c.dom.Node interface (as part of DOM3).
Is there anyone who has investigated the consequences of these changes, and I
am referring to the previously terrible situation with the DOM1 to DOM2
transiti
Infrastructure would be a better place for the technical, though a
discussion on policies would be better here at community :-)
I CC: infrastructure to get an answer from the mail wizards (please cc:
Carlos, I'm not sure he's in the infra list)
El miÃ, 13-10-2004 a las 16:21 +0200, Carlos Sanchez
Hi,
Not sure if this is the correct mailing list for these kind of issues but maybe
someone can help.
When trying to send a message with a zip file attached through cvs.apache.org,
using a ssh tunnel, I get
552 we don't accept email with executable content (#5.3.4)
The zip content are text fi
On Wednesday 13 October 2004 16:44, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
> In the end, the majority of the 99% must adjust to the 1% of idiots.
Hmmm At a 2 magnitude superiority in manpower, the majority is unable to
keep them in check, and weed them out? Is that a matter of lack of tools, or
does
On Tue, 2004-10-12 at 19:21, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> On Tuesday 12 October 2004 21:02, Ben Hyde wrote:
>
> > Projects that: fail to
> > welcome new comers; fail to bring in credible new contributors ... well
> > they are just stupid. They will ultimately become dysfunctional and
> > implode.
>
>
--On Tuesday, October 12, 2004 9:34 PM +0200 Santiago Gala
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You can separate both functions, i.e. development or patching and code
review/quality control. The linux kernel is beginning to be a good
example, where you have:
- Linus (vanilla) tree as a reference value (thi
10 matches
Mail list logo