I question the labeling of Cobertura as our dogfood and Clover as not
our dogfood.
Which is 'our dogfood', the GPL product or the proprietary product
built on top of permissively licensed Open Source (not that I know if
Clover is like this; but I've heard the same argument against JIRA)?
Do we
Talking about our own dogfood, it probably makes a better argument
Nexus (used in the ASF) vs Archiva (Apache project)
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 8:10 PM, Henri Yandell hyand...@gmail.com wrote:
I question the labeling of Cobertura as our dogfood and Clover as not
our dogfood.
Which is 'our
Nexus/Archiva one still also falls into the GPL vs Permissive camp
though. A better one is Proprietary Sun Java vs Harmony.
Generally the answer on 'internal' tools, is that volunteer and merit
is more important than product dogfooding (why wasn't an Archiva set
up?). On 'external' products (i.e.
