> That map shows only one person in Australia...how are the people
> determined?
cvs co committers
more krell/FAQ
vi urls.txt
cvs commit..
Done.
Dw.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
F
Santiago Gala wrote:
> Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
> (...)
> >
> >
> > Darn - I was quite happy as I got it to work after endless fiddling on IE,
> > Mozzila and Safari on MacOSX and a PC. So I guess it needs more fine
> > tuning. Which is well out of my expertize range. Any takers ?
> > http://
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That map shows only one person in Australia...how are the people
determined?
There is a file urls.txt in the committers module in CVS. Add yourself in
and add the appropriate bits to the given URL (check the ones there for
examples). I'll be adding myself soon as I get s
From: Rodent of Unusual Size <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
> > The map on:
> >
> >http://cvs.apache.org/~dirkx/sgala.html
> >
> > has had a wee enhancement; if you zoom in far enough; the boring
digital
> > terrain map of etoto5 gets replaced by mapblast. Depending on
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> That map shows only one person in Australia...how are the people
> determined?
Do 'cvs checkout committers' and 'cd krell'
See the FAQ. Also there are various past threads
on committers@
I have been feeling very alone, being the only target here.
Especially with the b
From: Rodent of Unusual Size <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
> > The map on:
> >
> >http://cvs.apache.org/~dirkx/sgala.html
> >
> > has had a wee enhancement; if you zoom in far enough; the boring
digital
> > terrain map of etoto5 gets replaced by mapblast. Depending on
Well, my position a couple of miles off the right spot.
The coordinates are supposed to be in fractions of a degree, *not*
degrees minutes seconds. Also, the georeference could spoil the "fine
tuning". I can't remember the name (WGS, I think)
fine tuning?
1 minute is 1 nautical mile, so 1/60 in
> I see people talking about co-ordinate precision of
> less than 100 metres. So how are they determining
> their position? Do they each have a differential GPS
> in their pocket? If someone has some clever facility
> to determine an accurate position, then please tell us.
>
I am not using GPS, j
David Crossley wrote:
I see people talking about co-ordinate precision of
less than 100 metres. So how are they determining
their position? Do they each have a differential GPS
in their pocket? If someone has some clever facility
to determine an accurate position, then please tell us.
I ended up pl
Santiago Gala wrote:
Another one, "~n" in "~nacho" gives a newline in
krell/bin/scrape_location.pl, and thus fails. I don't speak enough
perl for this one.
My fault. I've poked a repair into the sources.
(Funny, it took 57 people to trigger these bug, while "n" should be
1/25 or so ;-)
We can
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
> On 26 Feb 2003, David Crossley wrote:
>
> > > http://cvs.apache.org/~dirkx/sgala.html
>
> > I gather that you must be using some browser-specific
> > facilities here. I use Mozilla and the map is a mess
> > after the first zoom.
>
> Darn - I wa
Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
(...)
Darn - I was quite happy as I got it to work after endless fiddling on IE,
Mozzila and Safari on MacOSX and a PC. So I guess it needs more fine
tuning. Which is well out of my expertize range. Any takers ?
http://cvs.apache.org/~dirkx/inline.js is the culprit.
Wa
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Santiago Gala wrote:
> My GPS (a modern cheap Garmin eTrex), averaged during a whole night up
> in my house drifted no more than 5m around. This is consistent with the
> positioning in the map, now that I have entered six figures in my data.
Another thing to check on your G
David Crossley wrote:
Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
Now I've noticed quite a few folks falling off the shore, and into a
nearby rivers and canals. Which unless you are living on a boad - is
propably not quite correct. So I'd love to know if that is projection
issue; or a true issue with the location
David Crossley wrote:
Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
Now I've noticed quite a few folks falling off the shore, and into a
nearby rivers and canals. Which unless you are living on a boad - is
propably not quite correct. So I'd love to know if that is projection
issue; or a true issue with the location
On 26 Feb 2003, David Crossley wrote:
> I see people talking about co-ordinate precision of
> less than 100 metres. So how are they determining
> their position? Do they each have a differential GPS
> in their pocket? If someone has some clever facility
> to determine an accurate position, then
On 26 Feb 2003, David Crossley wrote:
> > http://cvs.apache.org/~dirkx/sgala.html
> I gather that you must be using some browser-specific
> facilities here. I use Mozilla and the map is a mess
> after the first zoom.
Darn - I was quite happy as I got it to work after endless fiddling on IE
Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
> Now I've noticed quite a few folks falling off the shore, and into a
> nearby rivers and canals. Which unless you are living on a boad - is
> propably not quite correct. So I'd love to know if that is projection
> issue; or a true issue with the location you entered.
Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
>
> The map on:
>
> http://cvs.apache.org/~dirkx/sgala.html
>
> has had a wee enhancement; if you zoom in far enough;...
I gather that you must be using some browser-specific
facilities here. I use Mozilla and the map is a mess
after the first zoom.
Is there
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> > has had a wee enhancement; if you zoom in far enough; the boring digital
> > terrain map of etoto5 gets replaced by mapblast. Depending on which part
> > of the world you're in, the projection is about right :-)
>
> heh heh. now to tie in t
Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
> The map on:
>
> http://cvs.apache.org/~dirkx/sgala.html
>
> has had a wee enhancement; if you zoom in far enough; the boring digital
> terrain map of etoto5 gets replaced by mapblast. Depending on which part
> of the world you're in, the projection is about ri
Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
Now I've noticed quite a few folks falling off the shore, and into a
nearby rivers and canals. Which unless you are living on a boad - is
propably not quite correct. So I'd love to know if that is projection
issue; or a true issue with the location you entered.
I zoome
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> can somebody remind me of where to find the address->long/lat mapping
> for the US? I'm about a mile off on the new zoom in and would like to
> try adding some digits.
http://geourl.org/ has a couple of links.
- ask
--
ask bjoern hansen, http://ask
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> can somebody remind me of where to find the address->long/lat mapping
> for the US? I'm about a mile off on the new zoom in and would like to
> try adding some digits.
This tool
http://demo.asemantics.com/zoom.pl
shows the point of click bel
David Reid wrote:
1 minute is 1 nautical mile, so 1/60 instead of 1/100 could get you there.
^^^
Only at the equator...
I forgot to say "meridian", sorry. In Latitude, one minute is always 1
nautical mile, In Longitude (East-Westwards) only in the Equator.
So I stand half corre
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, David Reid wrote:
> > 1 minute is 1 nautical mile, so 1/60 instead of 1/100 could get you there.
>^^^
> Only at the equator...
Or use the minutes N/South - they are more constant.
Dw
Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, Santiago Gala wrote:
>I'm about 20m (60ft) NE. But I wonder what would happen if I add another
>figure to the urls.txt thing.
Please try !
can somebody remind me of where to find the address->long/lat mapping
for the US? I'm about a mile off on th
> 1 minute is 1 nautical mile, so 1/60 instead of 1/100 could get you there.
^^^
Only at the equator...
david
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Really, really great! just about 15 meters off target...(middle/south germany).
muchas gracias, the map rocks!
cheers,
Erik
Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
The map on:
http://cvs.apache.org/~dirkx/sgala.html
has had a wee enhancement; if you zoom in far enough; the boring digital
terrain map o
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, Santiago Gala wrote:
> I'm about 20m (60ft) NE. But I wonder what would happen if I add another
> figure to the urls.txt thing.
Please try !
Dw
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
Torsten Curdt wrote:
Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
The map on:
http://cvs.apache.org/~dirkx/sgala.html
has had a wee enhancement; if you zoom in far enough; the boring digital
terrain map of etoto5 gets replaced by mapblast. Depending on which part
of the world you're in, the projection is about
Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
The map on:
http://cvs.apache.org/~dirkx/sgala.html
In
http://memojo.com/memojowiki/Wiki.jsp?page=SantiagoGalaBlog_blogentry_250203_2
I have two scaring maps from Dirk ;-) Spanish comments, I'm trying to
not forget my Spanish. I'm trying to _also_ blog in Eng
Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
The map on:
http://cvs.apache.org/~dirkx/sgala.html
has had a wee enhancement; if you zoom in far enough; the boring digital
terrain map of etoto5 gets replaced by mapblast. Depending on which part
of the world you're in, the projection is about right :-)
Amazin
Nevermind, if you zoom in far enough (below about 50 yards), it is spot
on.
Way to go!
> As far as I can tell, in the SF Bay area, it is off by about
> 20 feet. Not bad at all :)
>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
F
As far as I can tell, in the SF Bay area, it is off by about 20 feet.
Not bad at all :)
Scott
> Now I've noticed quite a few folks falling off the shore, and
> into a nearby rivers and canals. Which unless you are living
> on a boad - is propably not quite correct. So I'd love to
> know if tha
35 matches
Mail list logo
