-
From: Andrew C. Oliver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2002 02:03
To: community@apache.org
Subject: DOH! Re: Rules for Revolutionaries
Well this makes my second mail faux pax this week. I actually didn't
mean to send this. I sometimes type a mail
On Fri, 8 Nov 2002, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2002 20:03:07 -0500
From: Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: community@apache.org
To: community@apache.org
Subject: DOH! Re: Rules for Revolutionaries
Well this makes my second mail faux pax this week. I actually
The scary part is that all of us who have been flamed by Andy now need
to wonder what the first version of those messages looked like! Yikes!
grin
-- jt
On Fri, 2002-11-08 at 20:03, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
Well this makes my second mail faux pax this week. I actually didn't
mean to send
On 8 Nov 2002, James Taylor wrote:
Date: 08 Nov 2002 20:56:50 -0500
From: James Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: community@apache.org
To: community@apache.org
Subject: Re: DOH! Re: Rules for Revolutionaries
The scary part is that all of us who have been flamed by Andy now need
Actually, I quite enjoyed the reply :-). And the cautions you raise are
definitely relevant.
Well I meant every word of it I just meant to state
it...differently ;-)
You can over-engineer anything, including a community. But you can also
under-engineer, and I get the impression that's
Often the uncensored version requires a dictionary and a book called
Why we say it at hand to
get the undertones and coloquialisms. ;-)
http://www.m-w.com
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1555210104/qid=1036809530/sr=8-4/ref=sr_8_4/102-8855271-2563317?v=glances=booksn=507846
James
Craig wrote:
You can over-engineer anything, including a community. But you can also
under-engineer, and I get the impression that's sort of where we are right
now.
I get the impression that, although many of us feel as if our community is
indeed under engineered that infact the feeling is
