On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 09:08:59 +
robert burrell donkin wrote:
> software patents encourage innovation? don't make me laugh!
> hahaha
Let's laugh! Join in the laughter! .. singing "Yellow *Submarine*" :)
-
Tetsuya Kitahata -
On 13 Feb 2004, at 07:28, Conor MacNeill wrote:
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 01:19:40 -0500, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
See: http://www.internetnews.com/dev-news/article.php/3312091
Patent:
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&u=/
netahtm
l/search-adv.htm&r=9
> Doesn't prior art invalidate such patents?
> "Systems, methods and data structures for encompassing scripts written
> in one or more scripting languages in a single file" does not sound
> *that* innovative here ;-)
Nothing about it sounds innovative. In terms of prior art, what about
http://ww
Le Vendredi, 13 fév 2004, à 07:19 Europe/Zurich, Noel J. Bergman a
écrit :
See: http://www.internetnews.com/dev-news/article.php/3312091
...
Does anyone have any idea how this would effect Ant, Maven, Jelly, JSP
and
other technologies that use XML to describe scripting?...
Doesn't prior art inva
--On Friday, February 13, 2004 6:28 PM +1100 Conor MacNeill
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It is hard to see Ant being affected as its publication precedes the filing
date for the patent, if that is relevant. Not sure about the other projects.
FWIW, in the US, it is first to invent not first to file.
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 01:19:40 -0500, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
See: http://www.internetnews.com/dev-news/article.php/3312091
Patent:
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&u=/netahtm
l/search-adv.htm&r=9&p=1&f=G&l=50&d=ptxt&S1=Microsoft.ASNM.&OS=AN/Micro
