Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
All legal matters are for the Board and the Foundation's attorneys to
address.
Regarding audits ...
There is a presumption of innocence in our legal system. I do not believe
that due diligence requires an a priori presumption of fraud, and a
investigation to prove its
On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:27:35 -0500
Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
Except that it is not. I just think I'll bring it up in 6 months
when there are more dead bodies floating around. Noel does a great PR
job though.
Oh, Dead Bodies? ... scared.
I do not think there are dead bodies. However, i think
On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 22:22:17 +0100
Santiago Gala Pérez wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
(...)
| Many of us rant in email, delete, then recompose with some decorum.
| Since many things that are discussed in community involve strongly held
| personal opinions and beliefs, this safety measure
Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
From: Rich Bowen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
First of all, thanks for this thorough resonse.
Sure.
True. This does belong on community@
I think it belongs in the Incubator, as the Incubator is exactly for
these discussions (where constructive).
Interested parties can subscribe
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 12:33:00 +0100
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
From: Rich Bowen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
First of all, thanks for this thorough resonse.
Sure.
True. This does belong on community@
I think it belongs in the Incubator, as the Incubator is exactly for
these
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
So, like I said, I clearly missed what you suggested as fixes to the
problems that you perceive. While I'm sure that this discussion belongs
on the incubator list, rather than here, I have a strong suspicion that
you're going to respond with a
. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: community@apache.org
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 23:21:50 -0500
To: community@apache.org
Subject: RE: Undermining the Incubator
Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
I suggested that Blojsom might be a good choice for hosting ASF
project news and might also make a great ASF
2004 01:34:55 -0500
To: community@apache.org community@apache.org
Subject: Re: Undermining the Incubator
In summary: Oh of course no problems exist, its all fixed and happy. Just
don't mind the dead bodies floating in the pond.
--
Andrew C. Oliver
http://www.superlinksoftware.com/poi.jsp
.
From: Steven Noels [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: community@apache.org
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 08:58:35 +0100
To: community@apache.org
Subject: Re: Undermining the Incubator
On Jan 13, 2004, at 7:48 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
In summary: Oh of course no problems exist, its all fixed
From: Rich Bowen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: community@apache.org
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 21:24:49 -0500 (EST)
To: general@incubator.apache.org general@incubator.apache.org
Cc: community@apache.org community@apache.org
Subject: Re: Undermining the Incubator
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, Andrew C
At 12:36 AM 1/13/2004, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
The Send button is near the close button. I missed.
Suggestion from an httpd/apr hothead to our community forum participants
[NOT specifically ACO]...
Delay sending messages: [30] (minutes)
is a really great option to enable, well worth the effort
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
(...)
| Many of us rant in email, delete, then recompose with some decorum.
| Since many things that are discussed in community involve strongly held
| personal opinions and beliefs, this safety measure ensures that
So, like I said, I clearly missed what you suggested as fixes to the
problems that you perceive. While I'm sure that this discussion belongs
on the incubator list, rather than here, I have a strong suspicion that
you're going to respond with a note to the effect that you've already
been
13 matches
Mail list logo
