On Thu, 22 Jan 2004 10:32:33 -0500 (EST)
Dave Brondsema wrote:
I see Planet
Apache (as it stands today) as a way to get a flavour of an author, who has
some association w/ Apache, to see if I wish to add them to my own
aggregator or not. As such, I see no harm in Jakarta Gump
--On Thursday, January 22, 2004 8:26 AM -0700 Adam R. B. Jack
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, now what? Do I just add it back, or what? Maybe Planet Apache needs
some PMC control...
This is *exactly* why Planet Apache isn't part of the ASF. The fact that
Thom exposes the RSS listing to the ASF
Tetsuya Kitahata [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Gump's not a person. Like you said, the planet is for authors
(people) associated with apache.
Here is what emacs' doctor has to say about its younger electronic
colleague:
Yep, Gump is not a person, but a chain restaurant of Shrimp dishes.
Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
Finally, any progress from anybody on FOAF type metadata at Apache? As I
said, I use PlanetApache to 'test out an author' (see if they
amuse/stimulate me) and I'd be just as fine w/ a FOAF chain of relationships
as the PlanetApache blog roll. I know many folks reference
On 23 Jan 2004 09:12:06 +0100
David N. Welton wrote:
Apache Planet -- is like a box of chocolates - you never know what
you are going to get! ... ;-)
What makes you believe planet might want to have this box?
Not sure. :)
Please read
http://jakarta.apache.org/gump/
and
Sigh.
Ok, this is a little late, but...
Before I read this thread, I put a link to the Gump feed in the sidebar
for Planet Apache. I also posted why I chose to do this. My biggest
issue with the Gump feed was that it was drowning out (by volume) the
postings by people. I personally
On Jan 22, 2004, at 7:58 PM, Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
Finally, any progress from anybody on FOAF type metadata at Apache? As
I
said, I use PlanetApache to 'test out an author' (see if they
amuse/stimulate me) and I'd be just as fine w/ a FOAF chain of
relationships
as the PlanetApache blog roll. I
Sigh.
Sorry to hear that..
Ok, this is a little late, but...
Before I read this thread, I put a link to the Gump feed in the sidebar
for Planet Apache.
I think there was a lot of miscommunication (with thoughts passing like
ships in the night) as threads occured on blogs, on
IIRTC (bottom): Thom May removed the Jakarta Gump entry stating This really
is not what planet is about. Now Thom might be correct, it is an opinion,
but I don't recall a debate on the worthiness of Gump, nor on exactly
what/whom Planet Apache is meant to be for.
Is Planet Apache somehow about
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
hardly Magellan ;), but not about the health of inter-relationships of
Apache projects? Interesting. Sure, Gump is an automated feed, but is it so
inappropriate?
What was in that feed? I missed it. How would an automated feed be in
any way like the
What was in that feed? I missed it.
From config.ini:
#[http://lsd.student.utwente.nl/gump/index.rss]
#name = Jakarta Gump
#face = http://gui.apache.org/images/apache_feather_bullet.gif
See also: http://lsd.student.utwente.nl/gump/index.html
How would an automated feed be in
I think if gump were a little less verbose it would be a good
addition,
personally. Maybe the whole gump result set as one entry would work
better. I like the *idea* of it being there, the initial practice of
it
was just... verbose =)
And some of the human bloggers weren't
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
I see Planet
Apache (as it stands today) as a way to get a flavour of an author, who has
some association w/ Apache, to see if I wish to add them to my own
aggregator or not. As such, I see no harm in Jakarta Gump participating.
Gump at least only
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
El jueves, 22 ener, 2004, a las 17:04 Europe/Madrid, Adam R. B. Jack
escribió:
What was in that feed? I missed it.
From config.ini:
#[http://lsd.student.utwente.nl/gump/index.rss]
#name = Jakarta Gump
#face =
snip/
Thom and Ted, IIRC. I agreed with the decision. Several others did as
well, apparently. I think if gump's postings were limited to a
1-or-2-paragraph message once a day, it might've been different.
OTOH...reading a build failure just isn't as much fun as reading about
someone's holiday.
The gump feed could hardly be called microcontent. It was rather
content spam.
Due to it's verbosity or it's boringness? Those are things I can accept (if
only I could apply them to some others ;-). Inappropriate content is
another. It seems a bit of a shame we've already started cutting
On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 10:03:14AM -0700, Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
On Gump ... seriously though. If the issue w/ Gump is merely that is it
verbose/noisy -- and posts too many items (it does only post once a day) --
anybody mind if I re-subscribe it if I fix that?
Looking at the example link
On Jan 22, 2004, at 12:03 PM, Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
That said, I'm starting to feel the need
to champion the cause of disenfranchised computer bloggers. ;-)
AliceBlog!
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
I'd prefer it not be put back in. If I'm interested in Gump, I'll just
subscribe to Gump. I view PlanetApache as an aggregation of individual
opinions from the Apache community.
BTW: As for the humans, I'd prefer if the whole posting was in the RSS,
not just a summary. It really slows down
19 matches
Mail list logo
