RE: annou...@apache.org, was Re: Newsletter.

2003-08-19 Thread Brian Behlendorf
On Mon, 18 Aug 2003, Noel J. Bergman wrote: (b) subscribe each [EMAIL PROTECTED] to announce@apache.org Whoa whoa whoa. b) is backwards - from the other discussions on this, you wanted to subscribe announce@apache.org to each [EMAIL PROTECTED], not the other way around. I think

Re: annou...@apache.org, was Re: Newsletter.

2003-08-19 Thread Tetsuya Kitahata
On Mon, 18 Aug 2003 16:26:18 -0700 (PDT) Brian Behlendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK. My concerns about one list trying to deliver to another remain. I still am not sure it's wise to automate that. For example, just today I found that the announce@ws.apache.org list was configured to

Re: annou...@apache.org, was Re: Newsletter.

2003-08-18 Thread shane_curcuru
Someone said: Ah! It sounds as if other people aren't aware of the background and original intent. From what you are saying, announce@apache.org should be subscribed to announce@tlp.apache.org. That way announcements would automatically funnel to [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1 to the general idea.

Re: annou...@apache.org, was Re: Newsletter.

2003-08-18 Thread Thom May
* Noel J. Bergman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : So then it sounds as if two action items are to: (a) ensure that each TLP has an announce@ (b) subscribe each [EMAIL PROTECTED] to announce@apache.org Works for me. Sounds good, unless anyone has any reservations I'll look at doing this

Re: annou...@apache.org, was Re: Newsletter.

2003-08-18 Thread Brian Behlendorf
On Mon, 18 Aug 2003, Thom May wrote: * Noel J. Bergman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : So then it sounds as if two action items are to: (a) ensure that each TLP has an announce@ (b) subscribe each [EMAIL PROTECTED] to announce@apache.org Works for me. Sounds good, unless anyone has

RE: annou...@apache.org, was Re: Newsletter.

2003-08-18 Thread Noel J. Bergman
(b) subscribe each [EMAIL PROTECTED] to announce@apache.org Whoa whoa whoa. b) is backwards - from the other discussions on this, you wanted to subscribe announce@apache.org to each [EMAIL PROTECTED], not the other way around. I think you're saying what I meant. announce@apache.org is

annou...@apache.org, was Re: Newsletter.

2003-08-17 Thread Erik Abele
On 16/08/2003, at 11:58, Noel J. Bergman wrote: Joshua Slive wrote: When I originally proposed the announce@apache.org list, the purpose was this: Each project would send their announcements to their own list (eg. announce@httpd.apache.org) AND send a copy to [EMAIL PROTECTED] That way people

Re: annou...@apache.org, was Re: Newsletter.

2003-08-17 Thread Ben Hyde
Ah! It sounds as if other people aren't aware of the background and original intent. From what you are saying, announce@apache.org should be subscribed to announce@tlp.apache.org. That way announcements would automatically funnel to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Is that right? I'm not suggesting we reopen