On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 06:06:54PM -0400, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
I don't know whether this was a symptom, a remedy, or a cause. Isn't the
fact these tags needed to be removed some telltale? I'm just wondering,
since you seem to advocate this as a good community pattern.
I fully admit that
On 10/06/2003 1:45 Greg Stein wrote:
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 06:06:54PM -0400, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
I don't know whether this was a symptom, a remedy, or a cause. Isn't the
fact these tags needed to be removed some telltale? I'm just wondering,
since you seem to advocate this as a good community
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 06:06:54PM -0400, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
...
Some negative aspects of @author would be the impression that the
author owns the code, and reluctance on the part of others to make
changes to someone else's code.
The @author tag implies _authorship_. If we had an @owns
As for CVS logs, they are rather ephemeral things in my experience.
Whenever a file is renamed/repackaged, the history is lost. Sometimes
CVS modules are re-imported (as with Avalon, and xml-cocoon -
cocoon-2.1) and everything is lost.
This isn't necessary, it is possible to keep histories
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 12:00:45PM +0100, Danny Angus wrote:
As for CVS logs, they are rather ephemeral things in my experience.
Whenever a file is renamed/repackaged, the history is lost. Sometimes
CVS modules are re-imported (as with Avalon, and xml-cocoon -
cocoon-2.1) and everything
On 10/06/2003 14:05 Jeff Turner wrote:
Yes, and isn't it fun.
[snip]
LOL
You should check TortoiseCVS ;-)
/Steven
--
Steven Noelshttp://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source, Java XML Competence Support Center
Read my weblog at
Ben Hyde escribió:
a big +1 on the whole (big one plays nice with my comment, see below)
(...)
But unlike a piece of capital equipment an open source project is a lot
more than it's CVS repositories. It's much more social construct than
that. Economists don't really like to think about social
Jeff,
Yes, and isn't it fun.
--fun snipped-- ;-)
So should we only do things that are fun?
Moving and re-naming files in an ssh terminal session is not crazily graphical
nor easy enough for a 4 year old, but I bet there are enough people in Apache
who can do it without sweating that it is,
Danny Angus escribió:
Jeff,
Yes, and isn't it fun.
--fun snipped-- ;-)
So should we only do things that are fun?
Moving and re-naming files in an ssh terminal session is not crazily
graphical nor easy enough for a 4 year old, but I bet there are
enough people in Apache who can do it without
Ben Hyde [EMAIL PROTECTED]
... There is no clearing house were I can
exchange one performance fix for two clear explanations.
LOL! If you want to talk Xalan, I'm sure I could scrape up a couple of
clear explanations if you have some performance enhancements to contribute...
Actually,
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 01:58:16PM +0100, Danny Angus wrote:
Jeff,
Yes, and isn't it fun.
--fun snipped-- ;-)
So should we only do things that are fun?
Moving and re-naming files in an ssh terminal session is not crazily
graphical nor easy enough for a 4 year old, but I bet there
On Tuesday, June 10, 2003, at 03:01 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 01:58:16PM +0100, Danny Angus wrote:
Jeff,
Yes, and isn't it fun.
--fun snipped-- ;-)
So should we only do things that are fun?
Moving and re-naming files in an ssh terminal session is not crazily
graphical nor easy
Moving and re-naming files in an ssh terminal session is not
crazily graphical nor easy enough for a 4 year old, but I bet
there are enough people in Apache who can do it without
sweating that it is, IMO, a poor excuse for throwing away
useful information.
Bah.
ObPlug
Use Subversion.
13 matches
Mail list logo
