On Sun, 17 Aug 2003 01:13:02 +0200
Erik Abele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ah! It sounds as if other people aren't aware of the background and
original intent. From what you are saying, announce@apache.org should
be
subscribed to announce@tlp.apache.org. That way announcements would
Someone said:
Ah! It sounds as if other people aren't aware of the background and
original intent. From what you are saying, announce@apache.org should
be
subscribed to announce@tlp.apache.org. That way announcements would
automatically funnel to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1 to the general idea.
* Noel J. Bergman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
So then it sounds as if two action items are to:
(a) ensure that each TLP has an announce@
(b) subscribe each [EMAIL PROTECTED] to announce@apache.org
Works for me.
Sounds good, unless anyone has any reservations I'll look at doing this
On Mon, 18 Aug 2003, Thom May wrote:
* Noel J. Bergman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
So then it sounds as if two action items are to:
(a) ensure that each TLP has an announce@
(b) subscribe each [EMAIL PROTECTED] to announce@apache.org
Works for me.
Sounds good, unless anyone has
(b) subscribe each [EMAIL PROTECTED] to announce@apache.org
Whoa whoa whoa. b) is backwards - from the other discussions on this, you
wanted to subscribe announce@apache.org to each [EMAIL PROTECTED],
not the other way around.
I think you're saying what I meant. announce@apache.org is
