On 24/9/03 18:23, Dirk-Willem van Gulik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, Sander Temme wrote:
i like the idea of having them during sessions. diversity is good,
and since it's so free-format, and the same gurus can come back
(bwb -- bribed with beer) for encores, i think it's
On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 09:57:07PM +0100, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Pushing the idea of a guru (IMVHO) is exactly the opposite of pushing the
idea of a community. It's a single individual over the bazillion of people
behind this or that project, and I wouldn't want it to be seen as a
serious
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Pushing the idea of a guru (IMVHO) is exactly the opposite of pushing the
idea of a community. It's a single individual over the bazillion of people
behind this or that project, and I wouldn't want it to be seen as a
serious figure promoted by the
In my opinion the key idea of the ASF is to push the idea of the different
communities behind a project.
Pushing the idea of a guru (IMVHO) is exactly the opposite of pushing
the
idea of a community.
How does making it plural work for you? IOW, The Gurus Are In. That is
somewhere between
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
In my opinion the key idea of the ASF is to push the idea of the different
communities behind a project. I can't count how many times I heard on our
lists that a project can be considered mature only when the original
author left and someone else in the community picked
Rodent of Unusual Size dijo:
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
In my opinion the key idea of the ASF is to push the idea of the
different communities behind a project. I can't count how many times I
heard on our lists that a project can be considered mature only when
the original author left and someone
