At 03:04 PM 11/19/2004, Brian Behlendorf wrote:
This may be completely inappropriate for this list... but this, is so,
*wrong*. And no matter what side of the political spectrum you sit on, I know
transparency and auditability and trust is important to you - that's why
you're here at Apache.
On Saturday 20 November 2004 05:04, Brian Behlendorf wrote:
This may be completely inappropriate for this list...
Yes it is. ASF is not political, and AFAIU fairly international, and for the
non-USA community, this doesn't concern us any more than dirty politics in
other countries.
but
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
The way you make the bed, is the way you are going to sleep.
Niclas,
in case you didn't notice, the ASF is *NOT* a democracy.
--
Stefano.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
On Saturday 20 November 2004 17:38, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
The way you make the bed, is the way you are going to sleep.
in case you didn't notice, the ASF is *NOT* a democracy.
I wasn't making a comment from a democratic PoV. And if any 'democratic'
principles, such
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
The only result (if proved true) is the complete loss of faith
in any form of electronic voting by the general public for at
least the next 20 years.
You're kidding, right? Is there anyone here who has faith in unauditable
systems? Electronic voting, at least as
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
systems? Electronic voting, at least as practiced here in the USA, is a
farce, and a disaster either waiting to happen, or already happening. And
I'm wondering who (whether in Apache or elsewhere) will build the first
open source electronic voting system. :)
--
Serge
On Sat, 2004-11-20 at 18:08, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
The only result (if proved true) is the complete loss of faith
in any form of electronic voting by the general public for at
least the next 20 years.
You're kidding, right? Is there anyone here who has
At 11:08 AM 11/20/2004, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
The only result (if proved true) is the complete loss of faith
in any form of electronic voting by the general public for at
least the next 20 years.
You're kidding, right? Is there anyone here who has faith in
Serge Knystautas wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Electronic voting, at least as practiced here in the USA,
is a farce, and a disaster either waiting to happen, or
already happening.
I'm wondering who (whether in Apache or elsewhere) will build
the first open source electronic voting
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Let's make certain you read me right. I said General Public.
right now, in general, they trust the 'machine' more than people.
Once confidence is destroyed, no manner of encryption/transaction
tracking/electronic audit will satisfy them.
And this is a bad
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Serge Knystautas writes:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
systems? Electronic voting, at least as practiced here in the USA, is a
farce, and a disaster either waiting to happen, or already happening. And
I'm wondering who (whether in Apache or
This may be completely inappropriate for this list... but this, is so, *wrong*.
And no matter what side of the political spectrum you sit on, I know
transparency and auditability and trust is important to you - that's why you're
here at Apache. And yes, this is news; not a rehash of what you
12 matches
Mail list logo
