On Thu, 2004-02-26 at 16:51, Greg Stein wrote:
On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 03:02:39PM -0500, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Sounds like Fitz is working to get out the last kinks in cvs2svn.py, which
will be a good thing.
A lot of work on cvs2svn was done in February. Fitz is essentially using
the ASF
Sander Striker wrote:
On Thu, 2004-02-26 at 21:02, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Is SVN being proposed for Incubation? I hadn't heard.
SVN is built on top of APR, and also implements an Apache module
(mod_dav_svn), so it already uses a lot of ASF code. That said,
it would totally rock if SVN would
Jeff Trawick wrote:
Sander Striker wrote:
On Thu, 2004-02-26 at 21:02, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Is SVN being proposed for Incubation? I hadn't heard.
SVN is built on top of APR, and also implements an Apache module
(mod_dav_svn), so it already uses a lot of ASF code. That said,
it would totally
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, BAZLEY, Sebastian wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Daniel L. Rall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26 February 2004 17:32
To: community@apache.org
Subject: Subversion 1.0
Seeing as how there is already a fair amount of tools support
available, and
with the
On Fri, 2004-02-27 at 16:22, Rich Bowen wrote:
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, BAZLEY, Sebastian wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Daniel L. Rall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26 February 2004 17:32
To: community@apache.org
Subject: Subversion 1.0
Seeing as how there is already a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 27 February 2004 09:50 am, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
Sander Striker wrote:
On Thu, 2004-02-26 at 21:02, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Is SVN being proposed for Incubation? I hadn't heard.
SVN is built on top of APR,
On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 09:50:20AM -0500, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
...
SVN is built on top of APR, and also implements an Apache module
(mod_dav_svn), so it already uses a lot of ASF code. That said,
it would totally rock if SVN would come to the ASF.
...
I wonder how the SVN community
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, Brian. W. Fitzpatrick wrote:
Beyond that, I'm suspecting that a lot of the TODOs are going to be
related to the social issues of getting folks to start switching over.
And a few security issues. This was discussed a while back on
infrastructure, but I don't remember all
what's the checklist of TODOs to handle before dumping CVS?
I'm in favor of migration, but have all of the client tools caught up? Have
the Eclipse plug-ins caught up with current Eclipse?
FWIW, there are projects already using it, including:
- James jSieve
- Depot
- Directory
-
On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 03:02:39PM -0500, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
what's the checklist of TODOs to handle before dumping CVS?
I'm in favor of migration, but have all of the client tools caught up? Have
the Eclipse plug-ins caught up with current Eclipse?
Subclipse works against Eclipse 2.x.
10 matches
Mail list logo