Re: Subversion 1.0

2004-02-27 Thread Brian. W. Fitzpatrick
On Thu, 2004-02-26 at 16:51, Greg Stein wrote: On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 03:02:39PM -0500, Noel J. Bergman wrote: Sounds like Fitz is working to get out the last kinks in cvs2svn.py, which will be a good thing. A lot of work on cvs2svn was done in February. Fitz is essentially using the ASF

Re: Subversion 1.0

2004-02-27 Thread Jeff Trawick
Sander Striker wrote: On Thu, 2004-02-26 at 21:02, Noel J. Bergman wrote: Is SVN being proposed for Incubation? I hadn't heard. SVN is built on top of APR, and also implements an Apache module (mod_dav_svn), so it already uses a lot of ASF code. That said, it would totally rock if SVN would

Re: Subversion 1.0

2004-02-27 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
Jeff Trawick wrote: Sander Striker wrote: On Thu, 2004-02-26 at 21:02, Noel J. Bergman wrote: Is SVN being proposed for Incubation? I hadn't heard. SVN is built on top of APR, and also implements an Apache module (mod_dav_svn), so it already uses a lot of ASF code. That said, it would totally

RE: Subversion 1.0

2004-02-27 Thread Rich Bowen
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, BAZLEY, Sebastian wrote: -Original Message- From: Daniel L. Rall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 26 February 2004 17:32 To: community@apache.org Subject: Subversion 1.0 Seeing as how there is already a fair amount of tools support available, and with the

RE: Subversion 1.0

2004-02-27 Thread Sander Striker
On Fri, 2004-02-27 at 16:22, Rich Bowen wrote: On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, BAZLEY, Sebastian wrote: -Original Message- From: Daniel L. Rall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 26 February 2004 17:32 To: community@apache.org Subject: Subversion 1.0 Seeing as how there is already a

Re: Subversion 1.0

2004-02-27 Thread Dave Brondsema
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 27 February 2004 09:50 am, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: Jeff Trawick wrote: Sander Striker wrote: On Thu, 2004-02-26 at 21:02, Noel J. Bergman wrote: Is SVN being proposed for Incubation? I hadn't heard. SVN is built on top of APR,

Re: Subversion 1.0

2004-02-27 Thread Greg Stein
On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 09:50:20AM -0500, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: ... SVN is built on top of APR, and also implements an Apache module (mod_dav_svn), so it already uses a lot of ASF code. That said, it would totally rock if SVN would come to the ASF. ... I wonder how the SVN community

Re: Subversion 1.0

2004-02-26 Thread Joshua Slive
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, Brian. W. Fitzpatrick wrote: Beyond that, I'm suspecting that a lot of the TODOs are going to be related to the social issues of getting folks to start switching over. And a few security issues. This was discussed a while back on infrastructure, but I don't remember all

RE: Subversion 1.0

2004-02-26 Thread Noel J. Bergman
what's the checklist of TODOs to handle before dumping CVS? I'm in favor of migration, but have all of the client tools caught up? Have the Eclipse plug-ins caught up with current Eclipse? FWIW, there are projects already using it, including: - James jSieve - Depot - Directory -

Re: Subversion 1.0

2004-02-26 Thread Greg Stein
On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 03:02:39PM -0500, Noel J. Bergman wrote: what's the checklist of TODOs to handle before dumping CVS? I'm in favor of migration, but have all of the client tools caught up? Have the Eclipse plug-ins caught up with current Eclipse? Subclipse works against Eclipse 2.x.