On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 09:50:20AM -0500, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
>...
> >> SVN is built on top of APR, and also implements an Apache module
> >> (mod_dav_svn), so it already uses a lot of ASF code. That said,
> >> it would totally rock if SVN would come to the ASF.
>...
>
> I wonder how the SVN
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 27 February 2004 09:50 am, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
> Jeff Trawick wrote:
> > Sander Striker wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2004-02-26 at 21:02, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> >>> Is SVN being proposed for Incubation? I hadn't heard.
> >>
> >> SVN is built o
On Fri, 2004-02-27 at 16:22, Rich Bowen wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, BAZLEY, Sebastian wrote:
>
> > >-Original Message-
> > >From: Daniel L. Rall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >Sent: 26 February 2004 17:32
> > >To: community@apache.org
> >
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, BAZLEY, Sebastian wrote:
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Daniel L. Rall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Sent: 26 February 2004 17:32
> >To: community@apache.org
> >Subject: Subversion 1.0
> >
> >
> >Seeing as how
Jeff Trawick wrote:
Sander Striker wrote:
On Thu, 2004-02-26 at 21:02, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Is SVN being proposed for Incubation? I hadn't heard.
SVN is built on top of APR, and also implements an Apache module
(mod_dav_svn), so it already uses a lot of ASF code. That said,
it would totally ro
>-Original Message-
>From: Daniel L. Rall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: 26 February 2004 17:32
>To: community@apache.org
>Subject: Subversion 1.0
>
>
>Seeing as how there is already a fair amount of tools support
>available, and
>with the advent of 1.0
Sander Striker wrote:
On Thu, 2004-02-26 at 21:02, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Is SVN being proposed for Incubation? I hadn't heard.
SVN is built on top of APR, and also implements an Apache module
(mod_dav_svn), so it already uses a lot of ASF code. That said,
it would totally rock if SVN would come
On Thu, 2004-02-26 at 16:51, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 03:02:39PM -0500, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > Sounds like Fitz is working to get out the last kinks in cvs2svn.py, which
> > will be a good thing.
>
> A lot of work on cvs2svn was done in February. Fitz is essentially using
>
On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 03:02:39PM -0500, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > what's the checklist of TODOs to handle before dumping CVS?
>
> I'm in favor of migration, but have all of the client tools caught up? Have
> the Eclipse plug-ins caught up with current Eclipse?
Subclipse works against Eclipse
On Thu, 2004-02-26 at 21:02, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > what's the checklist of TODOs to handle before dumping CVS?
>
> I'm in favor of migration, but have all of the client tools caught up? Have
> the Eclipse plug-ins caught up with current Eclipse?
In the process of I believe. Greg should be
> what's the checklist of TODOs to handle before dumping CVS?
I'm in favor of migration, but have all of the client tools caught up? Have
the Eclipse plug-ins caught up with current Eclipse?
FWIW, there are projects already using it, including:
- James jSieve
- Depot
- Directory
- SpamA
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, Brian. W. Fitzpatrick wrote:
> Beyond that, I'm suspecting that a lot of the TODOs are going to be
> related to the social issues of getting folks to start switching over.
And a few security issues. This was discussed a while back on
infrastructure, but I don't remember all
On Thu, 2004-02-26 at 11:32, Daniel L. Rall wrote:
> Seeing as how there is already a fair amount of tools support available, and
> with the advent of 1.0 that should turn into a flood, what's the checklist of
> TODOs to handle before dumping CVS? Huge improvements over CVS asside, I'd
> much r
Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
On Feb 23, 2004, at 9:58 PM, Brian W. Fitzpatrick wrote:
On Mon, 2004-02-23 at 09:02, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Awesome!
Yahoo !
Congratulations !
Seeing as how there is already a fair amount of tools support available, and
with the advent of 1.0 that should turn into
14 matches
Mail list logo
